<jonatack>
good question, apart from the debug log timestamp. there are some config options with ./build/src/bitcoind -help-debug | grep time ... but on the RPC side, running ./build/src/bitcoin-cli help | grep time didn't turn up much
andytoshi has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
PaperSword has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
PaperSword has quit [Client Quit]
<furszy>
instagibbs: in tests there is a mocktime field and a bumpmocktime() method in the node class, but.. IIRC, most tests don't use it. We usually get it from the last tip header.
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #31622: psbt: add non-default sighash types to PSBTs and unify sighash type match checking (master...psbt-sighashes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31622
bitdex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
andytoshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
Guest50 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
Guest50 has quit [Client Quit]
kevkevin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
SpellChecker has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
SpellChecker has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
WizJin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<WizJin>
hello
<WizJin>
i need help regarding recovering an old wallet
<WizJin>
anyone can help me
cmirror has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
cmirror has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
gribble has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
rszarka has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
conman has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #31623: tracing: Rename the `MIN` macro to `_TRACEPOINT_TEST_MIN` in log_raw_p2p_msgs (master...tracing_MIN_macro_rename) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31623
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
WizJin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
WizJin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
infernix has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
infernix has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
WizJin has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
gribble has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
conman has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
gribble has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
gribble has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jespada has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
gribble has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
Guyver2 has left #bitcoin-core-dev [Closing Window]
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
Guest79 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jespada has quit [Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
<bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #31626: depends: Use base system's `sha256sum` utility (master...250109-sha256sum) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31626
<achow101>
There is one preproposed meeting topic this week. Any last minute ones to add?
<glozow>
#here FirstLast
<cfields>
hi
<jonatack>
hola
<achow101>
#topic Kernel WG Update (TheCharlatan)
<TheCharlatan>
nothing new this week
<b10c>
hi
<sr_gi[m]>
Hi
<achow101>
#topic Erlay WG Update (sr_gi, gleb, marcofleon)
<sr_gi[m]>
I continued with simulations this week, working to address the most relevant outstanding question so far: what is a reasonable proportion of inbounds/outbounds for fanout.
<sr_gi[m]>
I’m still working on this question, but preliminary results seem to show that this is indeed a tradeoff between bandwidth and latency, so the parameters (and bandwidth savings) may depend on what is a reasonable propagation time for a transaction.
<sr_gi[m]>
I hopping to have some conclusions by next meeting, if not the next one (so 2 weeks TM)
rockhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<sr_gi[m]>
That's it for me
<achow101>
#topic MuSig2 WG Update (achow101)
<achow101>
There's been some testing of the PR with other implementations, and one of these testers discovered a more general issue with sighash type conflicts
<achow101>
've opened #31622 to fix those sighashing issues.
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31622 | psbt: add non-default sighash types to PSBTs and unify sighash type match checking by achow101 · Pull Request #31622 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<achow101>
#31242 and #31243 are still the next prs to review. #31242 seems to be rfm.
<core-meetbot>
achow101: Unknown command: #31242
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31242 | wallet, desc spkm: Return SigningProvider only if we have the privkey by achow101 · Pull Request #31242 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31243 | descriptor: Move filling of keys from `DescriptorImpl::MakeScripts` to `PubkeyProvider::GetPubKey` by achow101 · Pull Request #31243 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31242 | wallet, desc spkm: Return SigningProvider only if we have the privkey by achow101 · Pull Request #31242 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31242 | wallet, desc spkm: Return SigningProvider only if we have the privkey by achow101 · Pull Request #31242 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<achow101>
#topic Legacy Wallet Removal WG Update (achow101)
<achow101>
No updates, still waiting for review on #31495
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31495 | wallet: Utilize IsMine() and CanProvide() in migration to cover edge cases by achow101 · Pull Request #31495 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<achow101>
#topic package relay WG Update (glozow)
<glozow>
hi! I am still working on #31397, which looks closeish
<glozow>
It looks like I could collect the currently outstanding comments into a followup, but also happy to update, so more review would be appreciated
<glozow>
also i haven't given up on #31385 yet 😅
Cory has quit [Quit: Client closed]
<gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31385 | package validation: relax the package-not-child-with-unconfirmed-parents rule by glozow · Pull Request #31385 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<glozow>
It's a more comprehensive writeup of what this subproject of "package relay" is attempting to solve
<glozow>
That's it from me. I kind of wonder if we should rename this to "Tx Orphan Resolution" instead of calling it package relay
<achow101>
#topic moving meeting later by 3 hours (achow101)
<glozow>
ACK, but maybe more of a problem for the people who live in europe?
<achow101>
a couple of us are moving to the us west coast, myself included. the current meeting time there is 6 am, which is not a time that multiple people there would really be able to do, myself included.
<dergoegge>
would prefer to keep it as is
<cfields>
6am doesn't do it for you? :)
<achow101>
the current time is optimized for europe
<achow101>
cfields: i can barely do the current 9 am lol, but it's at least possible
<jonatack>
ACK. The last change made the meeting times more difficult for me.
<fanquake>
that’ll be 5/6pm in London/europe, so I assume you’ll just loose as many as you might gain
<jonatack>
(When I was in Europe, I rather liked the evening meeting times, but I digress.)
<glozow>
I remember last time we changed the time, we noted that fewer people lived on the west coast, and that's no longer the case
<dergoegge>
we have great attendance right now, i fear we'd be giving that up
<fanquake>
also that’ll be lunchtime for NYC?
<sipa>
hi
<vasild>
maybe have a poll?
<achow101>
we can do another time poll thing like last time
<cfields>
and I assume with +3 we'd completely lose aus/asia.
<sdaftuar>
hi
<stickies-v>
poll sounds like the best approach to me
<achow101>
since it looks like several people aren't here, let's wait until next week to decide based on the results of the poll
moresteakpls has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
Emc99 has quit [Quit: Client closed]
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
Emc99 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<achow101>
any other topics to discuss?
<sdaftuar>
sipa and i are here now, can give a cluster mempool update
<achow101>
#topic Cluster Mempool WG Update (sdaftuar, sipa)
<sdaftuar>
i just have a brief update, i'm started rebasing #28676 on top of sipa's txgraph implementation. once that is complete we'll have a pretty good idea of what the finish line looks like (and this may highlight any sharp edges we want to address in sipa's implementation)
<sdaftuar>
in the meantime sipa's txgraph PRs are the ones we'd like review on
<sipa>
there are three open txggraph PRs (31363, 31444, 31553), each one building on the next
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<sipa>
but i understand some reviewers are waiting for the full cluster mempool rebase on top of them
Guest33 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<sipa>
on the research side, we may need to replace the cluster linearization code (later, not now!) at some point, because the new algorithm looks super promising
Guest33 has quit [Client Quit]
<sipa>
when, and if, that happens, i don't expect txgraph to really change, except for swapping out the underlying calls
<sipa>
that's it for me, i think
<achow101>
any other topics to discuss?
<dergoegge>
#21590 and #31549 look ready for merge