< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] evansyulianto opened pull request #12521: <script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/… (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12521
< arubi> yuck
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #12521: <script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/… (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12521
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] evansyulianto opened pull request #12522: To Address 1Jdm5xrMHHqopKRcQSY8jdDtjPsm4nuLY (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12522
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #12522: To Address 1Jdm5xrMHHqopKRcQSY8jdDtjPsm4nuLY (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12522
< fanquake_> wumpus / sipa can you ban evansyulianto from GH
< sipa> not right now
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] dontbeascrub opened pull request #12523: RavenCoin (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12523
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #12523: RavenCoin (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12523
< jonasschnelli> ping cfields on the 0.16 detached signatures (see OSX PR)
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] shigeya opened pull request #12526: Docs: Minor description fix to build procedure on Debian wrt BerkeleyDB (master...debian9-build-hint-update) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12526
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ken2812221 opened pull request #12527: gitian-build.sh: fix signProg being recognized as two parameters (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12527
< kanzure> still looking for topic suggestions for the meetup. especially recent or upcoming issues and pull requests. kthx.
< provoostenator> When running make in /depends is there a way to skip certain packages, like OpenSSL?
< provoostenator> And in my case "everything I don't need if I'm not building QT"
< provoostenator> I can just run "make name-of-package" for each package that I need.
< provoostenator> Found "NO_QT=1"
< provoostenator> Found "NO_QT=1"
< provoostenator> I thought OpenSSL was only used QT these days, but it's not listed in depends/packages.mk under qt_packages = qrencode protobuf zlib
< provoostenator> Actually making individual packages with make name-of-package result in nothing in depends/the-platform/lib, only make without argument does that. But NO_QT=1 works for my purpose.
< sipa> provoostenator: no, we still.use openssl to.generate randomness
< provoostenator> I suspect building non-QT for other platforms would be a lot easier without OpenSSL, right? Is there any PR in progress to generate this randomness without OpenSSL?
< provoostenator> (other platforms such as iOs, see #11720)
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11720 | iOS Deployment Target for RPC · Issue #11720 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< provoostenator> sipa: I see you tried somethign along those lines with #10299
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10299 | Remove OpenSSL by sipa · Pull Request #10299 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< sipa> yes, haven't worked on it further
< michagogo> Okay, I’m back online and it looks like my build finished uploading at 14:47:38 <michagogo> https://1drv.ms/f/s!AvCguGMVwWzLgxcDhVPN2iRMdHNQ
< arubi> assert diff between me and michagogo : https://gist.github.com/fivepiece/c1b5f6b03edb0e108890eb97431dd514 . it's pretty weird.
< arubi> maybe not weird, for some reason I thought packages of the same version should have the same hash..
< provoostenator> So basically even bdb is different. That could be a nice minimum set to debug...
< provoostenator> Is there any depends that's identical?
< arubi> provoostenator, I think it's a red herring. my hash is different others while we got the same hash for the binary
< michagogo> arubi: Why are you root?
< arubi> michagogo, where?
< michagogo> In that gist
< arubi> ah the '#' is just for the comment
< michagogo> Ah.
< arubi> yea I had to add that in afterwards because diff would just show file descriptors otherwise
< cfields> jonasschnelli: thanks. I was waiting on a few more sigs, since michagogo had a mismatch for win
< cfields> I'd say we have enough matches now though
< michagogo> cfields: Any idea how to figure out what's different?
< michagogo> I'm curious how that happened
< cfields> michagogo: sorry, I haven't had a chance to look into it
< cfields> michagogo: i'd say first step would be to use lxc/kvm, whichever you didn't use the first time
< michagogo> I'd try to figrue it out myself if I had any clue how :-/
< michagogo> figure*
< michagogo> I use LXC because it's inside a VM, so KVM's not really an option
< arubi> well it's only the linux binaries that are different. need to figure out which package exists for those that doesn't for the other ones
< arubi> and only the x86_64 ones
< michagogo> Hm, will trying to attach the signatures fail?
< luke-jr> michagogo: I used to do nested KVM
< michagogo> arubi: Windows too
< michagogo> Though apparently only the zip files, not the installers o_O
< michagogo> luke-jr: KVM nested inside Virtualbox?
< michagogo> AFAIK it can be okay to nest the same hypervisor inside itself in some cases (Hyper-V supports it, IIRC), but I haven't had any luck mixing them
< arubi> I'm only seeing lines 168-172 for bitcoin stuff
< michagogo> arubi: lines 4, 6, 7, 9
< arubi> ah right! I only have the linux diff in the gist
< arubi> doh
< luke-jr> michagogo: KVM nested inside KVM
< michagogo> Yeah, that's what I thought
< GitHub4> [bitcoin-detached-sigs] theuni closed pull request #5: 0.16: osx signatures for 0.16.0 (0.16...0.16) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-detached-sigs/pull/5
< cfields> gitian builders: detached sigs for v0.16.0 are pushed
< cfields> michagogo: sorry to push without figuring out what's up with yours. I just don't want to hold things up for a single mismatch.
< michagogo> cfields: I mean, nothing that’s being signed is mismatched
< michagogo> Both installer exes match, as does the macOS build
< cfields> michagogo: ah, our win-unsigned-*tar.gz match?
< michagogo> They're actually not tar.gzs
< michagogo> bitcoin-0.16.0-win32-setup-unsigned.exe and bitcoin-0.16.0-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
< michagogo> cfields: sigs pushed
< michagogo> And yep, they do
< cfields> michagogo: perfect. thanks :)
< esotericnonsense> hm. is TransactionRemovedFromMempool (main signals, validationinterface.cpp) actually ever used?
< esotericnonsense> it looks like wallet.cpp calls TransactionRemovedFromMempool but only its own method, not the signal
< esotericnonsense> there's also other signals that seem unused. /me is starting to think he's an idiot. guess i'll hack them out and see what happens