< fanquake> ping wumpus
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Flowdalic opened pull request #13621: Check for datadir after the config files where read (master...init-swap-datadir-readconf) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13621
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Empact closed pull request #13619: Include cstring alongside select in compat/glib_sanity.cpp (master...glib-sanity) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13619
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #13622: Remove useless mapRequest tracking that just effects Qt display. (master...2018-07-kill-maprequest) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13622
< gmaxwell> ::yawn:: it's late.
< sipa> i concur
< mryandao> are there any observable preformance gains compiling bitcoin core with a non-default memory allocator shipped with gnu gcc (i.e. jemalloc/hoard)?
< jonasschnelli> ::yawn:: good morning....
< gmaxwell> you'd think... but I never observed any.
< mryandao> yes, i thought so, given the interesting results boasted by hoard
< mryandao> especially under multicore situations
< gmaxwell> I think I only tried tcmalloc and jemalloc.
< gmaxwell> but it's also been a while, and other things have been optimized.
< mryandao> is there much malloc-ing in other threads other than the main?
< gmaxwell> yes.
< gmaxwell> But glibc's malloc is not as stupid, I think one reason some of those benchmarks have looked so good is they benchmarked against older glibc malloc.
< gmaxwell> e.g. glibc does per-core areans.
< mryandao> i see
< gmaxwell> in any case, it's really easy to test these things using LD_PRELOAD.
< gmaxwell> so, e.g. you could try to benchmark a reindex.
< mryandao> with a different libc?
< gmaxwell> with jemalloc or whatever.
< mryandao> cool, learnt something new again today.
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 6 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b641f6042567...6c6a3001e51b
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 359e2e3 Wladimir J. van der Laan: depends: Add RISC-V support
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d7005e9 fanquake: depends: latest config.guess
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 409481c fanquake: depends: latest config.sub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #13543: depends: Add RISC-V support (master...2018_06_riscv_depends) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13543
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6c6a3001e51b...c05c93c5d8f5
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master dae0d13 Linrono: RPCAuth Detection in Logs...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c05c93c Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #13118: RPCAuth Detection in Logs...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #13118: RPCAuth Detection in Logs (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13118
< instagibbs> getting unicorns on PSBT PR :/
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c05c93c5d8f5...b05ded176466
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f95989b Ben Woosley: Fix AreInputsStandard test to reference the proper scriptPubKey...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b05ded1 MarcoFalke: Merge #13565: test: Fix AreInputsStandard test to reference the proper scriptPubKey...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #13565: test: Fix AreInputsStandard test to reference the proper scriptPubKey (master...p2sh-tests-pub-key) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13565
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ken2812221 opened pull request #13623: [WIP] Migrate gitian-build.sh to python (master...python-gitian-build) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13623
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] nishanthkumarpathi opened pull request #13624: particle_nishanth (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13624
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] nishanthkumarpathi closed pull request #13624: particle_nishanth (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13624
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs closed pull request #11120: [RPC] verifytxoutproof returns object including blockhash (master...verifytxoutproof-blockhash) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11120
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b05ded176466...fad42e8c4a9d
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a3b065b Anthony Towns: Error on missing amount in signrawtransaction*...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 685d1d8 Anthony Towns: [tests] Check signrawtransaction* errors on missing prevtx info
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fad42e8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #13547: Make signrawtransaction* give an error when amount is needed but missing...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #13547: Make signrawtransaction* give an error when amount is needed but missing (master...signrawamount) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13547
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] satwo opened pull request #13625: doc: Add release notes for -printtoconsole and -debuglogfile changes (master...printtoconsole_release_notes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13625
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #13626: qa: Fix some TODOs in p2p_segwit (master...Mf1807-qaSegwitTodos) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13626
< luke-jr> cfields: IMO the poll should be open to people who have contributed in the past, don't attend meetings, but would if it was at a better time.
< cfields> luke-jr: agree. From the mail to the list: "If you regularly attend the weekly meetings (or can't now but may be able to attend at a different time), but do not receive a link to vote..."
< cfields> luke-jr: feel free to reply with a clarification/objection if you'd like
< * luke-jr> peers at his eyes. Somehow they skipped over the parenthesis section. O.o
< IGHOR> Hello, anyone here?
< booyah> IGHOR: that number "247 nicks" showing in your IRC chat client, is the number of people being here, indeed. Btw any questions not about DEVELOPING bitcoin itself are for -> #bitcoin
< IGHOR> developing Bitcoin core itself or projects that uses it?
< booyah> IGHOR: mostly the former... what is the question?
< IGHOR> I have a question about vin
< IGHOR> so Each vout have "n" number that is just numeric number of it
< IGHOR> and each vin have "vout" number that should direct to "vout": n field right? so what if there is no vin for specified vout and it is not mined coin?
< IGHOR> let say there is one "vin" and it have value "vout":2, so why other "vout"'s have no own vin if not mined?
< booyah> IGHOR: rather, all inputs (vin) are summarized to arrive at totall input ballance, and that together goes and divides into all vout. difference is the txfee. let's continue in #bitcoin
< IGHOR> ok
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] 251Labs opened pull request #13627: Free keystore.h from file scope level type aliases (master...patch/cleanup-keystore.h) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13627