< windsok> +1 to making invalid options in bitcoin.conf a warning. I'm having trouble figuring out which option is causing the error
< warren> windsok: +1
< ken2812221> Seems like mingw does not support wchar_t in filename, but msvc do.
< ken2812221> what I am talking about is fstream.
< ken2812221> mingw do provide _wfopen that support wchar_t filename, but they don't have the same support on C++ fstream.
< luke-jr> sipa: ^
< sipa> luke-jr: hmm, how portable?
< luke-jr> x86 only I think
< luke-jr> apparently introduced in GCC 4.8
< luke-jr> Clang 3.8
< sipa> luke-jr: i mean clang etc
< jonasschnelli> cfields: my trusty build seems to be broken due to updates I made for Bionic (or something else is missconfigured). Can you provide me the osx unsigned tarball?
< jonasschnelli> gitian: any idea why my Gitian build for 0.16.2 (trusty) failes (while master Bionic build works)?
< jonasschnelli> I get a ./bin/gbuild:21:in `system!': failed to run on-target -u root bash < target-bin/upgrade-system.sh > var/install.log 2>&1
< jonasschnelli> Install.log complains with "Failed run an application inside container"
< ken2812221> jonasschnelli: Did you set environment variables: gitian ip and host ip?
< jonasschnelli> ken2812221: Looks good. Install.log shows that all the packages are getting installed successfully
< jonasschnelli> Also, it works with current master (Bionic)
< jonasschnelli> Or am I supposed to use different IPs (env var) for trusty?
< jonasschnelli> I think its related to upgrading gitian to the newest master or upgrading LXC
< achow101> cfields: are 0.16.2 detached sigs available yet?
< fanquake> achow101 waiting on jonas ^
< jonasschnelli> achow101: can't build it.... issue with gitian (see above).
< jonasschnelli> But you can provide me you osx unsigned tarbar if you have PRed your sigs
< jonasschnelli> (or someone else)
< ken2812221> jonasschnelli: I've sent you an email with binary, did you receive the email? You need to rename it since gmail does not accept .dmg suffix.
< jonasschnelli> ken2812221: got it. Will check later
< jonasschnelli> ken2812221: Oh. I don't need the DMG, I need the osx-unsigned.tar.gz...
< jonasschnelli> Maybe fanquake or achow101 can send me a download link (or the tarbal itself).
< jonasschnelli> I'll verify the hash with the available signatures and publish the detatched sigs
< ken2812221> jonasschnelli: Sry. Resent it.
< ken2812221> Oh no I sent the wrong file built by bionic.
< ken2812221> I'm very sorry about that.
< ken2812221> Oh wait, I sent the right file. I only use Bionic to built 0.16.2rc2 to test #13782
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13782 | Fix osslsigncode compile issue in gitian-build by ken2812221 · Pull Request #13782 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jonasschnelli> ken2812221: the file sha256sum doesn't match the available signatures: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gitian.sigs/blob/master/0.16.2-osx-unsigned/laanwj/bitcoin-osx-0.16-build.assert
< jonasschnelli> You file: e56b7d20bc7bfb8203f1651ddcf4fc18d8685acf942a8c7b90919f29e24db3a1 bitcoin-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
< jonasschnelli> Expected: 64e7d96d0497112aa808ff94e63eb18bff1535cf6237e7c1d602f0fca167e863
< ken2812221> Oh, I sent you the another .tar.gz file in the .assert file, resent the correct one.
< jonasschnelli> ken2812221: sry. :) now my fault. I need: e56b7d20bc7bfb8203f1651ddcf4fc18d8685acf942a8c7b90919f29e24db3a1 bitcoin-0.16.2-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
< jonasschnelli> So.. hash seems to be correct. Sry for the confusion
< jonasschnelli> cfields: sigs ---> https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-detached-sigs/pull/10 (thanks ken2812221)
< cfields> jonasschnelli: thanks
< cfields> gitian builders: v0.16.2 detached sigs are up