01:28 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c1bab5052a2b...c8fee6769a10

01:28 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a2aabfb Hennadii Stepanov: Use qInfo() if no error occurs

01:29 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c8fee67 fanquake: Merge #16263: qt: Use qInfo() if no error occurs

01:29 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #16263: qt: Use qInfo() if no error occurs (master...20190621-qInfo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16263

03:21 < sdupre> Currently miners seem to be the sole deciders of soft-fork activation. Is this intentional? Could an opcode be made like "OP_VERIFYBLOCKSUPPORTSFORK" where transactions could only be valid in blocks that signal activation? Then users could pressure miners by withholding fees...

07:58 < fanquake> sipa Can you comment on #13084

07:58 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13084 | Do not turn OP_1NEGATE in scriptSig into 0x0181 in signing code by sipa · Pull Request #13084 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

08:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #13472: [devtools translations] catch invalid specifiers (master...HashUnlimited-translate-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13472

08:09 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #13442: Convert the 1-way SSE4 SHA256 code from asm to intrinsics (master...201806_sse4intrin) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13442

08:11 < fanquake> Added a "Future" label for things that we may not be able to, or want to do now, but can/should revisit later on.

08:51 < meshcollider> fanquake: don't we already use the "Future" milestone for that

08:52 < meshcollider> I'm fine with using a label instead though

11:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] orientye opened pull request #16276: optimize for diagnosis of deadlock (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16276

12:59 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c8fee6769a10...44e849c35a7e

12:59 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 099e4b9 Hennadii Stepanov: Set AA_EnableHighDpiScaling attribute early

12:59 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 44e849c MarcoFalke: Merge #16254: qt: Set AA_EnableHighDpiScaling attribute early

13:00 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16254: qt: Set AA_EnableHighDpiScaling attribute early (master...20190620-EnableHighDpiScaling-warning) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16254

13:24 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] promag closed pull request #16215: gui: Refactor wallet controller activities (master...2019-06-refactor-wallet-controller-activities) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16215

15:21 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] gertjaap opened pull request #16277: Supress output in test_bitcoin for expected errors (master...issue-15944) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16277

15:28 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #16278: tests: Reduce compilation time and unneccessary recompiles by removing unused includes in tests (master...cut-compilation-bloat-in-unit-tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16278

16:18 < jonasschnelli> Compiling win64 (minGW, standard depends build) on linux X86 leads to "configure: error: librt missing"

16:18 < jonasschnelli> Anyone seeing the same issue?

16:19 < jonasschnelli> the depens with HOSTx86_64-w64-mingw32 builds fine

16:22 < jonasschnelli> nm,... I had --enable-glibc-back-compat enabled

19:10 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/44e849c35a7e...e115a21f79c4

19:10 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0e01e45 Wladimir J. van der Laan: devtools: Fetch and display ACKs at sign-off time in github-merge

19:10 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e115a21 MarcoFalke: Merge #16223: devtools: Fetch and display ACKs at sign-off time in github-...

19:11 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16223: devtools: Fetch and display ACKs at sign-off time in github-merge (master...2019_06_contrib_acks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16223

19:25 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #16279: Return the AcceptBlock CValidationState directly in ProcessNewBlock (master...2019-06-pnb-dos-state) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16279

23:31 < fanquake> jonasschnelli: on which Linux? I haven’t see that compiling on WSL recently. Can investigate today.