Currently miners seem to be the sole deciders of soft-fork activation. Is this intentional? Could an opcode be made like "OP_VERIFYBLOCKSUPPORTSFORK" where transactions could only be valid in blocks that signal activation? Then users could pressure miners by withholding fees...
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #16278: tests: Reduce compilation time and unneccessary recompiles by removing unused includes in tests (master...cut-compilation-bloat-in-unit-tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16278
Compiling win64 (minGW, standard depends build) on linux X86 leads to "configure: error: librt missing"
Anyone seeing the same issue?
the depens with HOSTx86_64-w64-mingw32 builds fine
nm,... I had --enable-glibc-back-compat enabled