< fanquake> Seems GH forgot how to colour for a minute: https://0bin.net/paste/Gok8bgWp#kVzPbN-sWO26BiHc91MiRivcoVdtipdICt0BG1eo+cg
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] avainlakech opened pull request #21518: 0.21 (master...0.21) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21518
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #21518: 0.21 (master...0.21) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21518
< fanquake> sipa: please block avainlakech
< sipa> fanquake: already done
< fanquake> thank
< sipa> (i actually started writing "fanquake: already done" before seeing your message :p
< sipa> you are predictable
< fanquake> it did cross my mind whether I should even bother to ping you hah
< fanquake> just got a nice email from that person
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/90 | Improve debug logging by jgarzik · Pull Request #90 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< hebasto> fanquake: hah, last week I was banned in linguist telegram group after mentioning translation Bitcoin Core
< fanquake> hebasto: hope you got the info you needed beforehand
< hebasto> nope :)
< fanquake> Same person has followed up by emailing me a private key. “Here, take my private key, you get zero bitcoin”
< sipa> How nice.
< aj> sipa: Add a comment: "round up to the next strictly larger multiple of 1000"? -- would "Have each group of tests be counted by the 1000s part, starting at 1000" be clear enough? explains more the why than the what
< sipa> aj: sgtm
< fanquake> “You are ruining people's lives.”
< fanquake> it really is the morning for nice emails
< bitcoin-git> [gui] hebasto opened pull request #257: refactor: Use template function qOverload in signal-slot connections (master...210323-overload) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/257
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 25 commits to 0.21: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1bad33f952ea...a30fd40735eb
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.21 c33fbab Vasil Dimov: net: allow CSubNet of non-IP networks
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.21 bdce029 Vasil Dimov: test: add test for banning of non-IP addresses
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.21 7bf3ed4 Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: GUI: Restore SendConfirmationDialog button default to "Yes"
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #20901: [0.21.1]: rc1 Backports (0.21...2101-2101Backports) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20901
< aj> fanquake: what is "your branch" that differed from 20901? is that something worth knowing about?
< aj> oh, duh, read the comment more carefully aj
< aj> fanquake: your correctly worded ACKs are ruining my life :(
< fanquake> aj: I'll try and word them more "fast and loose" going forward
< aj> oh wait, forget i said anything. i should be riffing off "said hanrahan" for fanquake ruining things
< aj> "We'll all be rooned" said fanquake's man // In an email most forlorn // Outside the repo, evading bans // One toasty We'n'sd'y morn. // The IRCers lurked and talked // PRs up to their ears // And talked of tests, CI and forks // As they had done for years.
< fanquake> when are you gunna release a book ?
< fanquake> aj's greatest hits. #8563 - #21489
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8563 | Add configure check for -latomic by ajtowns · Pull Request #8563 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21489 | fuzz: cleanups for versionbits fuzzer by ajtowns · Pull Request #21489 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< aj> i have a blog, that's kinda like a book
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #21520: [0.21] wallet: Avoid requesting fee rates multiple times during coin selection (0.21...0.21-createtx-same-feerate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21520
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21522: fuzz: [refactor] Use PickValue where possible (master...2103-fuzzPickValue) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21522
< fanquake> aj #21489 no longer draft right?
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21489 | fuzz: cleanups for versionbits fuzzer by ajtowns · Pull Request #21489 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/fa2a5b8f3aeb...f95071a3f5d3
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master aa7f418 Anthony Towns: fuzz: cleanups for versionbits fuzzer
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f95071a fanquake: Merge #21489: fuzz: cleanups for versionbits fuzzer
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21489: fuzz: cleanups for versionbits fuzzer (master...202103-versionbits-fuzz-followups) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21489
< aj> what?
< aj> that was a draft
< aj> duuuuuuude
< aj> you are ruining my life
< achow101> I think that was marked as a draft for a reason
< aj> fanquake: like it said in the description, it was a draft to avoid conflicting with the speedy trial PRs. now it'll also need backporting to 0.21
< aj> also, i'm loving this ruining my life meme
< fanquake> none of the speedy trial PRs are anywhere near close to being merged right?
< aj> well they're further away now!
< aj> should've titled it DO-NOT-MERGE as well as marked it draft i suppose
< fanquake> aj: apologies. Is there an overarching issue tracking how all of these PRs piece together. It's not very clear, and they all seem to based on, or borrow commits from each other etc.
< fanquake> I'm also just trying to figure out where the "root" of the conflict is. I assume e9e24b9ad836c4f425e6c22f1c4a179dab9e75ea ?
< aj> fanquake: there'll be neighbouring lines changed between removing the 'const x = 0' defaults and adding a 'const min_activation_height' if nothing else
< aj> fanquake: no big deal to fix in either PR, just extra rebasing we could've avoided
< fanquake> achow101: sorry. Thanks for the quick rebase.
< aj> fanquake: you could poke at #20353 if you wanted? :)
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20353 | configure: Support -fdebug-prefix-map and -fmacro-prefix-map by ajtowns · Pull Request #20353 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< fanquake> aj: sure
< aj> did something make master slower to compile recently or am i just seeing things?
< fanquake> since kinda recently all the fuzz targets now get built by default, which is a decent amount of additional compilation
< fanquake> nothing super recent I can recall
< aj> nah, would have to be more recent than that
< aj> maybe i'm just used to more ccache hits or something
< jonatack_> aj: yup same impression here, fuzz targets and qt code particularly
< jonatack_> jamesob: sipa: ariard
< jonatack_> ^ agree wrt disabletx
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f95071a3f5d3...7ce7ce5716c8
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 581791c bruno: test: add functional test for anchors.dat
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7ce7ce5 MarcoFalke: Merge #21338: test: add functional test for anchors.dat
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21338: test: add functional test for anchors.dat (master...2021-03-anchors-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21338
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 6 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7ce7ce5716c8...f67b5dca5766
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 61a0f8f Hennadii Stepanov: test: Cleanup test files in test-{security,symbol}-check.py
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0fc0c00 Hennadii Stepanov: test: Drop unused get_machine function
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a65e772 fanquake: Merge #21428: test: Cleanup in test-{security,symbol}-check.py
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #20734: build: Make platform-specific targets available for proper platform builds only (master...201221-targets) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20734
< jnewbery> aj: I did a bit of analysis on which symbols are being repeatedly built: https://0bin.net/paste/-OvrrVEt#RCFVJG+4cfPl1M7UmHWxu9HGLh+xLilkZM1XeR2v-bN
< jnewbery> the big offenders are tinyformat and boost::system
< jnewbery> I did the same for 0.21, and all the numbers have gone up
< jnewbery> the largest/most built symbol is this, which is new since 0.21:
< jnewbery> 289920 385 0000000000000755 W std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_replace(unsigned long, unsigned long, char const*, unsigned long)
< hebasto> jonasschnelli: hi
< jonasschnelli> hi
< hebasto> https://bitcoinbuilds.org needs libxkbcommon-x11 package :)
< hebasto> and `--enable-suppress-external-warnings` configure option is required for new upnp package
< hebasto> jonasschnelli: ^
< jonasschnelli> okay... let me add/change that
< hebasto> thank you
< jonasschnelli> hebasto: okay. Changed it.
< hebasto> jonasschnelli: many thanks!
< jonasschnelli> Thanks for telling me... I'm currently on vacation
< jonasschnelli> Just ping me whenever things need attention
< hebasto> have a nice time :)
< bitcoin-git> [gui] hebasto closed pull request #257: refactor: Use template function qOverload in signal-slot connections (master...210323-overload) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/257
< bitcoin-git> [gui] hebasto reopened pull request #257: refactor: Use template function qOverload in signal-slot connections (master...210323-overload) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/257
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jamesob opened pull request #21523: validation: parameterize VerifyDB by chainstate (master...2021-03-au-verifydb) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21523
< hebasto> jonasschnelli: my bad -- the correct package name is `libxkbcommon-x11-0` https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/libxkbcommon-x11-0
< jonasschnelli> hebasto: okay. Changed.
< jonatack> jonasschnelli: thanks! (hope you're getting some vacation waves)
< jonatack> hebasto: thanks for the heads up
< jonasschnelli> jonatack: Thanks and yes, waves are amazing (CR).
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f67b5dca5766...b1281b5d8fe3
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 804ac10 Larry Ruane: remove unnecessary newline from initWarning() argument
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b1281b5 MarcoFalke: Merge #21516: remove unnecessary newline from initWarning() argument
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21516: remove unnecessary newline from initWarning() argument (master...rm-unnecessary-newline) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21516
< jonatack> jonasschnelli: good to hear
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 6 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b1281b5d8fe3...23b15601dfeb
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master ebfb10c Igor Cota: Qt: add Android packaging support
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7563720 Igor Cota: CI: add Android APK build script
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master ba46ada Igor Cota: CI: add Android APK build to cirrus
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #17227: Qt: Add Android packaging support (master...qt-android-package) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17227
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/23b15601dfeb...ed49203daabb
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 39a9ec5 Troy Giorshev: Unconditionally check for fRelay field in test framework
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master ed49203 MarcoFalke: Merge #21357: test: Unconditionally check for fRelay field in test framewo...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21357: test: Unconditionally check for fRelay field in test framework (master...test-framework-ver-msg-fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21357
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] dongcarl opened pull request #21525: [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4 (master...2021-03-kernel-bundle-4.5) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21525
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jamesob opened pull request #21526: validation: misc. multi-chainstate preparation (master...2021-03-multi-chainstates) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21526
< jamesob> two new assumeutxo PRs up (#21523, #21526). can I have one or both added to the high-prio list?
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21523 | validation: run VerifyDB on all chainstates by jamesob · Pull Request #21523 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21526 | validation: misc. multi-chainstate preparation by jamesob · Pull Request #21526 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jamesob> they're orthogonal but if it would make sense to I can fold them into a single PR
< SuViVoR> hello everyone
< wumpus> jamesob: sure, do you have any preference which one (we like to keep it limited to one per person)
< jamesob> I'd say #21526 needs the closer look; the other one is mostly just a rename
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21526 | validation: misc. multi-chainstate preparation by jamesob · Pull Request #21526 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jamesob> that said, the other one should be an easy review
< wumpus> jamesob: added
< jamesob> wumpus: thanks!
< hebasto> jonasschnelli: according to the logs, `libxkbcommon-x11-0` is already installed; maybe there are problems with `LD_LIBRARY_PATH`?