00:18 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] JonathanTylerCombs opened pull request #29919: Codespace laughing carnival g44xqwpj7jj9367w (master...codespace-laughing-carnival-g44xqwpj7jj9367w) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29919

01:00 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 closed pull request #29919: Codespace laughing carnival g44xqwpj7jj9367w (master...codespace-laughing-carnival-g44xqwpj7jj9367w) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29919

01:00 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] JonathanTylerCombs opened pull request #29921: Check this out (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29921

01:03 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 closed pull request #29921: Check this out (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29921

06:11 <willcl-ark> > hmm was built off of: https://github.com/lightninglabs/docker-bitcoin-core/blob/master/26/Dockerfile -- I just build this dockerfile and got hash: ab06620aadcf814c0ef8274566631a0428119f1f7e218566c689d535cb515f75 /opt/bitcoin-26.0/bin/bitcoind

06:12 <willcl-ark> I'm syncing it now on testnet, but I'm guessing I won't hit the same errors you're seeing roasbeef...

06:17 <willcl-ark> Also possibly of interest to you, I am going to be maintaining **unofficial** docker images --which will actually be updated in a timely fashion-- of supported versions (i.e. not EoL), here: https://hub.docker.com/r/bitcoin/bitcoin I've modernised both alpine and debian builds a bit too. Possibly of note, there is no bdb wallet support -- only migration to sqlite (as BDB is going away

06:17 <willcl-ark> very soon). But everything else should match those unmaintained ruimarinho images.

09:08 <darosior> For what it's worth i'm not experiencing this on my 25.0 testnet node.

10:03 <willcl-ark> I did not have any issues syncing testnet using this image: https://github.com/lightninglabs/docker-bitcoin-core/blob/master/26/Dockerfile

15:42 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #29923: depends: Remove Qt build-time dependencies (master...2024-04-qtsowrap) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29923

16:15 <Unit640> Question: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/guix.sigs/tree/main/27.0 <-- Some/many of these contain both "noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS" and "all.SHA256SUMS". What does "all" and "noncodesigned" refer to exactly?

16:15 <Unit640> It appears as if only the "all." files are relevant, which leaves me puzzled by what the "noncodesigned." ones are for.

16:17 <sipa> Unit640: our deterministic build process works in two stages; in the first stage, people compile the binaries without code signatures from source; when those succeed and match, code signatures for those binaries are published, and in a second stage, everyone can compile the full signed binaries using those

16:19 <laanwj> yes, note that for platforms that don't have codesigning (so, all linux archs) what is in -noncodesigned is exactly the same as what is in -all

17:29 <achow101> roasbeef: did that datadir get uploaded? also, maybe rebuild that docker container and actually use the released bitcoind?

21:45 <Unit640> Hmm...

23:32 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fjahr opened pull request #29926: test: Fix multiprocess CI timeout in p2p_tx_download (master...2024-04-p2p-tx-multiprocess-fail) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29926