< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #12731: Support serialization as another type without casting (master...201803_astype) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12731
< jimpo>
ryanofsky: I still haven't had a chance to update the unit tests on #11857 based on your feedback, so maybe hold off a few more days on taking another look. I'll post on the PR when that is done.
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master de04fde practicalswift: bitcoin-cli: Provide a better error message when bitcoind is not running...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master a2b2476 practicalswift: tests: Test connecting to a non-existing server
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 8b2ef27 practicalswift: tests: Test connecting with non-existing RPC cookie file
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #12652: bitcoin-cli: Provide a better error message when bitcoind is not running (master...bitcoin-cli-error-message-when-bitcoind-is-not-running) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12652
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 728667b John Newbery: scripted-diff: rename TestNode to TestP2PConn in tests...
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 4ba3d4f MarcoFalke: Merge #12728: [tests] rename TestNode to TestP2PConn in tests...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #12728: [tests] rename TestNode to TestP2PConn in tests (master...rename_test_node) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12728
< luke-jr>
wumpus: same here
< luke-jr>
cfields: FYI, I suspect there is a problem with moc stuff and clean/rebuild; even with a full `make clean` (which shouldn't be needed), I often still end up with an obsolete src/qt/moc_paymentserver.cpp when switching between code that makes BIP70 optional and not
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] lutangar opened pull request #12736: [RPC][Refactoring] Meaningful error code when called with wrong number of arguments (master...error-code-for-param-number) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12736
< achow101>
wumpus: are you an admin on transifex?
< achow101>
for the bitcoin org
< wumpus>
achow101: I can do things such as remove translations, add translations, remove resources, add resources, but not change teams...
< Randolf>
achow101: I thought it was a collaborated effort.
< achow101>
Randolf: what do you mean?
< Randolf>
achow101: You mentioned that there's a need for an admin or team manager.
< achow101>
yeah, we need an admin or a team manager to give people enough permissions to do things with some of the translations
< achow101>
at some point some translation strings become locked and only someone with enough permissions can unlock them
< Randolf>
Do you need someone who can understand all the different languages?
< achow101>
Randolf: no
< achow101>
we need someone who responds to requests and has enough permissions
< achow101>
wumpus: it looks like tcatm (https://github.com/tcatm) was the one who set up transifex. Maybe send him an email and see if he can do something about this?
< Randolf>
I may be able to help.
< Randolf>
Let me know if I can.
< achow101>
Randolf: how so?
< Randolf>
If you need someone to put time into the administration side of things and responding to requests. I'd need to know more about what needs to be done, but I could certainly put time into this every day.
< Randolf>
I like Bitcoin, and if there's an area that needs someone to help I feel like I should.
< cfields>
luke-jr: can you describe the steps to reproduce?
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] pedrobranco opened pull request #12739: Fix unlocking of an already spent output (master...bugfix/fix-lockunspent-deadlock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12739
< luke-jr>
cfields: it happens on its own every other build I do, it seems; I guess check out and build various branches merged into the knots/tmp branch?
< luke-jr>
(presumably at some point, it would help to build the optional-BIP70 branch)
< luke-jr>
only reason I notice it is because the #ifdefs in the MOC stuff
< cfields>
ok
< TheCharlatan>
cfields I heard you are working on bringing the entire toolchain to depends. Is any of this public yet? I want to start working on this as well.
< cfields>
TheCharlatan: I'm working on getting it ready to push public.
< cfields>
luke-jr: I'm not sure how that's happening
< cfields>
luke-jr: if your branch makes that file optional, it would make sense that it wouldn't clean it
< cfields>
er, s/wouldn't/might not/, depending on config
< cfields>
eklitzke: I swear I'm not always so pedantic about build changes, you're just in hasn't-been-touched-in-years-because-it-just-works territory :)
< eklitzke>
"just works"
< eklitzke>
these two changes have been a valuable lesson in how the separation between the preprocessor, compiler, and linker is more of an illusion than anything else
< sipa>
haha
< luke-jr>
cfields: the file isn't optional; the change is to config.h and #ifdefs