17:05 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] lowogo opened pull request #19451: Merge pull request #1 from bitcoin/master (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19451

17:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] lowogo closed pull request #19451: Merge pull request #1 from bitcoin/master (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19451

22:07 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 4 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8783bcc099e9...171f4a516bd6

22:07 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8f1bcf8 Andrew Chow: walletdb: Combine VerifyDatabaseFile and VerifyEnvironment

22:07 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 91d1091 Andrew Chow: walletdb: Move PeriodicFlush into WalletDatabase

22:08 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d8e9ca6 Andrew Chow: walletdb: Move Rewrite into BerkeleyDatabase

22:08 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #19324: wallet: Move BerkeleyBatch static functions to BerkeleyDatabase (master...bdb-batch-rm-statics) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19324

22:21 < sipa> [A

23:07 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/171f4a516bd6...f4301e910792

23:07 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a76dafa Hennadii Stepanov: ci: Add tsan suppression for race in BerkeleyBatch

23:07 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f4301e9 MarcoFalke: Merge #19450: ci: Add tsan suppression for race in BerkeleyBatch

23:08 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #19450: ci: Add tsan suppression for race in BerkeleyBatch (master...200705-tsan-bd) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19450

23:34 < phantomcircuit> why does the txindex and blockfilter index try to "keep in sync" why not just check every block in the currently active chain when we start and then deal with changes? they both use leveldb so can easily tell a consumer whether they have that particular block in the index

23:35 < phantomcircuit> i guess for txindex it would be kind of annoying to have a partial index

23:35 < luke-jr> phantomcircuit: I'm not clear what you're suggesting to do different

23:54 < phantomcircuit> luke-jr, at least for the block filter index, instead of keeping track of the "tip" just walk the current chain and try to rebuild

23:54 < phantomcircuit> it makes something that's O(1) O(n) but it means it's more flexible

23:56 < sipa> phantomcircuit: it's not clear to me how that would be practically different

23:56 < sipa> you mean how you could have some blocks indexed and others not?

23:56 < sipa> on an individual basis?