< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 7 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0102f80b5113...511e58223b15
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 477df36 fanquake: build: reorder libs in _BITCOIN_QT_CHECK_STATIC_LIBS (move-only)
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 13313b2 fanquake: scripted-diff: replace Qt5 with ${qt_lib_prefix} in _BITCOIN_QT_CHECK_STAT...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 4b8ad97 fanquake: build: use QT_*_LIBS rather than passing lib names
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21565: build: make bitcoin_qt.m4 more generic (master...pre_qt6_refactors) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21565
< hebasto> MarcoFalke: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5699910122078208 "Requested memory is too high! You can request at most 4G per CPU"
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21609: ci: increase CPU count of sanitizer job to increase memory limit (master...up_cpu_count) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21609
< fanquake> hebasto: thanks for volunteering to pay for the CI
< hebasto> fanquake: ?
< fanquake> "... or use Compute Credits."
< hebasto> #20680
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20680 | ci: Only use credits for pull requests to the main repo by MarcoFalke · Pull Request #20680 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< fanquake> I'm not sure why we'd pay for something we can receive for free as far as I understand
< hebasto> I'm not aware of financial part of ci maintenance, just mentioned another possibility
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21610: build: remove -Wdeprecated-register from NOWARN flags (master...no_more_deprecated_register) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21610
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #21611: Fix a typo in guix-build output (master...202104_outdirt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21611
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/511e58223b15...e2777b532888
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5c09bca Pieter Wuille: Fix a typo in guix-build output
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e2777b5 fanquake: Merge #21611: Fix a typo in guix-build output
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21611: Fix a typo in guix-build output (master...202104_outdirt) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21611
< sipa> fanquake: going to kill a bunch of CI task so that it picks up the core count on quickly
< sipa> unless you know of another way to force it to do those immediately
< fanquake> sipa: no go ahead
< sipa> done
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e2777b532888...328aaac80d6f
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fab1987 MarcoFalke: test: Document race:validation_chainstatemanager_tests suppression
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 328aaac fanquake: Merge #21597: test: Document race:validation_chainstatemanager_tests suppr...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21597: test: Document race:validation_chainstatemanager_tests suppression (master...2104-testNoSupp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21597
< wumpus> "[GitHub API] Update your access token to the new format" huh
< fanquake> wumpus: where are you seeing that?
< achow101> don't be phished
< aj> i saw something about github moving away from user/pass tokens but didn't work out what they're doing instead
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/328aaac80d6f...9ac8f6d7ddc4
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa5eabe MarcoFalke: refactor: Remove negative lock annotations from globals
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 9ac8f6d MarcoFalke: Merge #21598: refactor: Remove negative lock annotations from globals
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21598: refactor: Remove negative lock annotations from globals (master...2104-syncNeg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21598
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9ac8f6d7ddc4...b2ec7d398fb0
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master de3ae78 fanquake: ci: increase CPU count of sanitizer job to increase memory limit
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b2ec7d3 MarcoFalke: Merge #21609: ci: increase CPU count of sanitizer job to increase memory l...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21609: ci: increase CPU count of sanitizer job to increase memory limit (master...up_cpu_count) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21609
< wumpus> in my mail (i'm defnitely not clicking anything, though it does correctly name the application used)
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b2ec7d398fb0...7b4934e550a4
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6526a16 fanquake: test: small cleanup in RPCNestedTests tests
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7b4934e MarcoFalke: Merge #21557: test: small cleanup in RPCNestedTests tests
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21557: test: small cleanup in RPCNestedTests tests (master...update_rpc_nested_tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21557
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #14920: Build: enable -Wdocumentation via isystem (master...isystem) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14920
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21613: build: enable -Wdocumentation (master...enable_wdocumentation) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21613
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7b4934e550a4...02fb5bdc2172
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1a011b3 fanquake: build: remove -Wdeprecated-register from NOWARN flags
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 02fb5bd MarcoFalke: Merge #21610: build: remove -Wdeprecated-register from NOWARN flags
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21610: build: remove -Wdeprecated-register from NOWARN flags (master...no_more_deprecated_register) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21610
< jonatack> "If you use any of these tokens, we encourage you to reset them now. This will give you additional security benefits and allow Secret Scanning to detect the tokens."
< wumpus> jonatack: thank you, that must be it
< wumpus> regenerated all my tokens just in case, not sure the mentioned rationale matters to me, but these kind of mails make me uncomfortable, what if there is a security problem but they couldn't reveal it
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 4 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/02fb5bdc2172...1a7dec77f610
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 4d6e246 Vasil Dimov: test: use pointers in denialofservice_tests/peer_discouragement
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 637bb6d Vasil Dimov: test: also check disconnect in denialofservice_tests/peer_discouragement
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 81747b2 Vasil Dimov: test: make sure non-IP peers get discouraged and disconnected
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21571: test: make sure non-IP peers get discouraged and disconnected (vasild) (master...2104-testPointers) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21571
< vasild> wumpus: "we were not hacked, but encourage everybody to change their passwords immediately" :-D
< wumpus> vasild: yesss
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 5 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1a7dec77f610...9be7fe484931
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 06030f7 W. J. van der Laan: contrib: generate-seeds.py generates output in BIP155 format
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 2a257de W. J. van der Laan: contrib: Add a few TorV3 seed nodes
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 9b29d5d W. J. van der Laan: contrib: Add explicit port numbers for testnet seeds
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #21560: net: Add Tor v3 hardcoded seeds (master...2021-03-torv3-hardcoded-seeds) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21560
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21614: [0.21] test: Backports (0.21...2104-21Backports) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21614
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #21615: script: Add trusted key for hebasto (master...210406-key) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21615
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21616: [0.21] build: link against -lsocket if required for *ifaddrs (0.21...backport_21486) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21616
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21617: fuzz: Fix uninitialized read in test (master...2104-fuzzValgrind) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21617
< MarcoFalke> does anyone know how to create unsigned psbts with the gui?
< MarcoFalke> I click "create unsigned" and get "The amount exceeds your balance."
< MarcoFalke> achow101: ^
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] rebroad opened pull request #21618: Reduce MinRelayFee slower when Mempool utilised and faster when not. (master...MinRelayFeeReductionChanges) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21618
< warren> MarcoFalke: ? I've used that recently without trouble
< MarcoFalke> I am probably doing something wrong
< warren> MarcoFalke: in my case I always use "Use available balance" and "Subject fee from amount" so I guess I get an exact amount where I don't run into that problem.
< MarcoFalke> warren: "available balance" is zero (because I only have watch-only balance)
< robert_spigler> " in my case I always use "Use available balance" and "Subject fee from amount" so I guess I get an exact amount where I don't run into that problem." -> This is how I always do it as well
< robert_spigler> "I only have watch-only balance)" -> Isn't that the issue?
< gwillen> "create unsigned" should still work in that setting
< warren> MarcoFalke: I noticed that watch-only I imported with "importaddress" are visible but not spendable. Enable Coin Control and see if those inputs are available for manual selection or not. "importmulti" and "importdescriptors" gave me the ability to choose those inputs for unsigned psbt creation.
< gwillen> ahh, I think the GUI is not very clear about whether watchonly coins are "solvable" or something
< gwillen> e.g. whether you have the redeemscript/witness script for spending
< MarcoFalke> ah, thx
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21619: ci: Run self-hosted ci (master...2103-ciSelfHosted) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21619
< jeremyrubin> fortnightly meeting in 5 minutes in ##taproot-activation if you would like to join
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jamesob opened pull request #21620: ChainstateManager locking improvements (master...2021-04-cs-lock-improvements) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21620
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] yerzhan7 opened pull request #21626: trivial: Fix typo in txrequest.cpp comment (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21626
< ajonas> Hi - jnewbery won't be able to make it today for the p2p meeting so I'll be hosting
< ajonas> #startmeeting
< sipa> hi
< ajonas> No proposed topics today
< ajonas> any updates or topics to add?
< ariard> hi
< ariard> from gleb : #21515 is up to review, he's working on unit test coverage
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21515 | Erlay: bandwidth-efficient transaction relay protocol by naumenkogs · Pull Request #21515 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< ariard> but can't make it today
< aj> hey
< ajonas> ok, short meeting
< sipa> short meeting is best meeting
< ajonas> #endmeeting
< ajonas> indeed
< jeremyrubin> hey, somewhat relevent here, notes from the activation meeting https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-April/018742.html
< mol_> 👍👍 Yᵒᵘ Oᶰˡʸ Lᶤᵛᵉ Oᶰᶜᵉ Good job jeremyrubin thanks!!
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 closed pull request #21392: Implement BIP 8 based Speedy Trial activation (master...bip8-speedy-trial) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21392
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 closed pull request #21393: BIP 341: Add Speedy Trial activation parameters (master...taproot-speedy-trial) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21393
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 closed pull request #21507: Implement BIP8 lockinontimeout (master...bip8) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21507