00:15 < ariard> luke-jr: you know, if you think we should take more time to appoint another bip editor, you're entitled to say so

00:16 < ariard> unless not acting jeopardize users safety, i think we can do better than nagging folks to act quickly during public meetings, either bip editors, maintainers or github orgs admin

00:39 < luke-jr> ariard: aside from timing (which will hopefully be resolved sooner anyway), I think my only concern is that there appears to be some kind of collusion going on between some other devs, and I do not know the extent of who is involved in it

00:40 < luke-jr> ariard: besides, at the end of the day, it's just a git repo of docs - absolute worst case, it can be rolled back or reverted

00:43 < luke-jr> maybe I'm just naive, but a few weeks ago I would never have imagined the behaviour I'm seeing from some people now

00:52 < yanmaani> what is this collusion?

07:54 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 6 commits to 0.20: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f1c3c53e5f94...56311988bff1

07:54 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.20 5f9537b Pieter Wuille: Implement Bech32m encoding/decoding

07:54 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.20 cf18ac9 Pieter Wuille: Add Bech32m test vectors

07:54 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.20 1a4e88e Pieter Wuille: Use Bech32m encoding for v1+ segwit addresses

07:54 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #21470: BIP 350: Implement Bech32m and use it for v1+ segwit addresses (0.20 backport) (0.20...202103_bech32m_0.20) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21470

07:58 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21762: test: Speed up mempool_spend_coinbase.py (master...2104-testSpeed) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21762

08:05 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 7 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/4b5659c6b115...66fd3b28e85c

08:05 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a67b548 Russell Yanofsky: Move common global init code to init/common

08:05 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 387c4cf Russell Yanofsky: Move common sanity check code to init/common

08:05 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 90469c1 Russell Yanofsky: Move common logging AddArg code to init/common

08:05 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21732: MOVEONLY: Move common init code to init/common (master...pr/initc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21732

09:17 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21763: test: Run AppInitSanityChecks before all tests (master...2104-testCommonInit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21763

10:23 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] wu-emma opened pull request #21764: build: produce Windows GUI build with Cirrus CI (master...cirrus-winbuild) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21764

13:52 < bitcoin-git> [gui] jonatack opened pull request #289: Add "Direction" column to peers tab (master...add-direction-column-to-peers-tab) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/289

14:06 < pox> what am I doing wrong WRT to the berkley db libraries?

14:06 < pox> $ ./configure BDB_LIBS="-L${BDB_PREFIX}/lib -ldb_cxx-4.8" BDB_CFLAGS="-I${BDB_PREFIX}/include"

14:07 < pox> $ make

14:07 < pox> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

14:08 < pox> cannot find -ldb_cxx-4.8

14:09 < jonatack> pox, that looks about right but maybe your install is elsewhere. perhaps these steps can help (or not ;) https://jonatack.github.io/articles/how-to-compile-bitcoin-core-and-run-the-tests

14:10 < pox> it's the same machine I've built core on for a long time now... incidentally it you're PR with the node counts that I'm trying to build :)

14:11 < jonatack> :)

14:12 < hebasto> pox: make clean

14:14 < pox> hebasto :-(

14:14 < jonatack> yeah, it's mentioned in that doc (or make distclean if make clean doesn't work)

14:19 < hebasto> pox: could you submit an issue, and add your steps and config logs?

14:50 < bitcoin-git> [gui] jonatack opened pull request #290: Peers window `Peer id` improvements (master...peer-id-improvements) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/290

16:01 < jeremyrubin> did how CI caching works change?

16:02 < jeremyrubin> unrelated to the actual PR itself, got a strange failure case on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21702

16:02 < jeremyrubin> i updated the PR with some python tests (only change)

16:03 < jeremyrubin> and then transaction_tests started failing with the error

16:03 < jeremyrubin> error: in "transaction_tests/tx_valid": mapFlagNames is missing a script verification flag

16:04 < jeremyrubin> that change was introduced my glozow https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blame/cfec4a1dad2181a5471b04f8a7b77ab64293fb13/src/test/transaction_tests.cpp#L191 looks like relatively recently

16:04 < jeremyrubin> I guess the CI is testing that this merges into that OK?

16:05 < glozow> jeremyrubin: did you add a new script verify flag?

16:05 < glozow> assuming you mean #21702. you need to add `SCRIPT_VERIFY_STANDARD_TEMPLATE` to the `mapFlagNames` in transaction_tests.cpp

16:05 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21702 | Implement BIP-119 Validation (CheckTemplateVerify) by JeremyRubin · Pull Request #21702 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

16:05 < jeremyrubin> ah I guess this just got merged a day ago

16:06 < jeremyrubin> err 4 days ago

16:06 < glozow> yes it's new

16:06 < glozow> added a check to make sure flags are soft forks for all the transaction tests

16:07 < jeremyrubin> gotcha; this is just the *standard* rule, not the consensus flags?

16:07 < jeremyrubin> wait

16:07 < jeremyrubin> i mean consensus

16:07 < jeremyrubin> my b

16:07 < glozow> er, what's the question?

16:09 < jeremyrubin> I think it's good i fix it

16:09 < glozow> cool :)

16:10 < jeremyrubin> err no...

16:10 < jeremyrubin> requires rebase

17:41 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin closed pull request #21702: Implement BIP-119 Validation (CheckTemplateVerify) (master...checktemplateverify-rebase-4-15-21) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21702

17:44 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin reopened pull request #21702: Implement BIP-119 Validation (CheckTemplateVerify) (master...checktemplateverify-rebase-4-15-21) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21702

18:10 < pox> hebasto alas, make clean didn't help. I'll submit an issue.

18:24 < pox> hebasto nm, my BDB_PREFIX was wrong :facepalm:

18:24 < hebasto> pox: ok

18:41 < luke-jr> MarcoFalke: do you already have a plan in place, to ensure nobody auto-upgrades to softfork releases via Snap?

18:59 < meshcollider> Anyone around for a wallet meeting ?

19:01 < fjahr> yes, but nothing to discuss for me

19:01 < meshcollider> How about achow101, jonatack, and provoostenator

19:02 < achow101> hello

19:02 < hebasto> hi

19:02 < achow101> not anything to discuss I think

19:03 < hebasto> just wanted to announce a "Wallet" label in the gui repo -- https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3AWallet

19:05 < meshcollider> hebasto: please feel free to "request review" from me on PRs there if you want to

19:06 < hebasto> meshcollider: thank you

19:12 < jonatack> hi

20:13 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] dongcarl opened pull request #21767: [Bundle 6/n] Prune g_chainman usage in auxiliary modules (master...2020-10-libbitcoinruntime-v8) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21767

20:29 < darosior> meshcollider: if you mind giving a quick look to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20867 , fanquake asked you for review some time ago, and many other wallet people ACKed (or previous versions of it without nits-fixing)

23:04 < bitcoin-git> [gui] RandyMcMillan opened pull request #291: Network Graph layout - debug window improvement. (master...net-graph-layout) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/291