abubakarsadiq has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
kevkevin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
AaronvanW has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
conman has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
conman has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
valiant has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
valiant has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
valiant has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
jadi has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
Guest93 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
AaronvanW has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
Guest93 has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
willcl-ark has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
TheRec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
TheRec has quit [Changing host]
TheRec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
TheRec_ has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
jadi has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
zato has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
cmirror has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
cmirror has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
willcl-ark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
willcl-ark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
willcl-ark has quit [Changing host]
valiant has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
jon_atack has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jonatack has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
wannabe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
wannabe has quit [Client Quit]
vysn has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
abubakarsadiq has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jonatack has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
jadi has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
jon_atack has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
kevkevin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
kevkevin has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
PaperSword has quit [Quit: PaperSword]
salvatoshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
adil1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
dongcarl has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
dongcarl has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
willcl-ark has quit [Quit: left]
willcl-ark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
willcl-ark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
willcl-ark has quit [Changing host]
AaronvanW has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
NSFAF__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
PaperSword has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<PaperSword>
The rules for bare_multisig in terms of being a valid TX are that it must not contain any more than 20 public keys. Now my question is what stops someone from submitting a transaction with an OP_CHECKMULTISIG into a testnet mempool where the number of pubkeys is greater than 20? The reason I ask about testnet is the acceptnonstdtxns would al'low these transactions to pass by the standardness filter.
<PaperSword>
The reason I ask would be that, could someone cause me to mine an invalid block because of the lack of a standardness filter on testnet.
<PaperSword>
Sorry for the incredibly bad phrasing.
<sipa>
PaperSword: op_checkmultisig can *by consensus rules* not accept more than 20 keys
abubakarsadiq has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
<sipa>
even if standardness/policy rules permit a transaction with more, the transaction will still be invalid and not be accept (its script validation would just fail)
<sipa>
so to be clear: the transaction would be invalid and thus not be accepter into mempool (it will also make a block it's in invalid, but it won't come to that)
<PaperSword>
Thus it would never enter the mempool to be mined into block. Thank you.
<PaperSword>
How would it even be possible to get values of n higher than 16?
<PaperSword>
Push a byte with a number?
<sipa>
you cannot use OP_n anymore, but you can just push the number
<PaperSword>
Thank you for taking time to answer that, genuinely had me puzzled for a moment.