< pierre_rochard> Hello, is there a guide for building the .deb binary?
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c0e513941398...6157e8ce3937
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8e4aa35 Aaron Golliver: move human-readable byte formatting to guiutil
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6b1891e Aaron Golliver: Add Sent and Received information to the debug menu peer list
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6157e8c Jonas Schnelli: Merge #11499: [Qt] Add upload and download info to the peerlist (debug menu)...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #11499: [Qt] Add upload and download info to the peerlist (debug menu) (master...provide-send-recv-count-to-peerlist) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11499
< Varunram> Core, I have a question with regard to the test suite. I'm looking for something which, given two chains, goes with the chain of more work. If someone could point me to it, that'd be great, Thanks!
< sipa> can you be more specific?
< sipa> what kind of something do you mean
< Varunram> oh, sorry! I meant a test like test_heavier_chain.py or something
< sipa> do you mean in the c++ unit tests, or the python test framework?
< Varunram> *python test framework
< sipa> p2p_fullblocktest tests things like that
< sipa> it creates multiple branches, with various combinations of valid and invalid transactions, and checks that bitcoind follows the most-work valid chain
< Varunram> thanks a ton! I'll look into it :)
< sipa> yw!
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6157e8ce3937...57ee73990f1c
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c96b2e4 Suhas Daftuar: qa: Fix replace-by-fee race condition failures
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6d51eae Suhas Daftuar: qa: Fix race condition in sendheaders.py
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 57ee739 MarcoFalke: Merge #11538: qa: Fix race condition failures in replace-by-fee.py, sendheaders.py...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #11538: qa: Fix race condition failures in replace-by-fee.py, sendheaders.py (master...2017-10-fix-rbf-test) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11538
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #11550: [0.15.1] qa: Backports (0.15...Mf1710-0151qaBackports) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11550
< Alkhara> Can anyone tell me why main.cpp was removed after 0.13 for both BTC and LTC?
< sipa> Alkhara: it was split into validation.cpp and net_processing.cpp
< Alkhara> ahhh thank you Sipa
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #11551: Fix invalid return value in GetBlockProofEquivalentTime(...) when to.nChainWork <= from.nChainWork (master...proof-equivalent-time) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11551
< seone> Guys im a bit confused: Do the latest translations from Transifex arrive the project? I checked bitcoin/src/qt/locale on github, and latest commit is 3 months ago. Is Wladimir still managing them; should i also try to take care a bit about synchronising? You can leave me a /msg memoserv seone or write me via Transifex in case i am currently not around here :)
< seone> Ok, at least we were not forgotten for 0.16.0 schedule: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11449 :)
< meshcollider> seone: They were updated on the 0.15 branch on September 16th: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/f266f2668bf8fd73015bf8265f0d00f5e858b577
< meshcollider> just not on master
< seone> Ahh ic, but the french translation files were still 3 months old. Ok thats what confused me^; Thanks, I think i know the problem now: Will have to write Wladimir :)
< achow101> seone: the translations are only updated for each version release, usually on the release branches, not the master branch
< seone> Yes, but a translated string from 6th July on 0.15.x context in Transifex should have arrived on the 0.15 github branch by 16th September