< fanquake>
dongcarl heh, I was going to post in that PR about gcc:8.3.0 seemingly no longer being available. Nice updates!
< dongcarl>
fanquake: Thank you! I admit that I've held back this update a little (whoops lol). I thought I could get windows and macosx easily but seems like it'll take a little bit haha.
< luke-jr>
?
< fanquake>
dongcarl: Cool. Hopefully we might get a chance to hack on that over the next couple weeks. I'll be pushing a bunch of guix related updated to /core-review/ today as well.
< luke-jr>
is there an issue with GCC 8.3.0?
< dongcarl>
luke-jr: Ah no! I think fanquake is following Guix master, where they've hidden the `gcc` package in favor of `gcc-toolchain`
< fanquake>
luke-jr: Looks like guix has just recently renamed it's gcc related packages.
< dongcarl>
fanquake: Ah there's not much to read up on :-) It's just saying that because of the way Guix is designed, you can deterministically build packages as if Guix was a few versions ago, or this commit at this remote, _without_ doing a `guix pull`. It's good to make sure that people who are getting the latest Guix version won't have inconsistencies just because their Guix is newer.
< fanquake>
dongcarl fair enough. guix pull also seems to be fairly heavy, more so inside a vm, so sitting on an older version/not having to worry about staying too up to date is handy.
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #16051: depends: add patch to common dependencies (master...depends-needs-patch) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16051
< ossifrage>
I was testing out the multiple wallets UI stuff (on testnet) and managed to create new addresses in the wrong wallet
< ossifrage>
I created them from the console and it wasn't obvious at the time that they where created in the 'other' wallet
< ossifrage>
v0.18.99.0-65526fc86
< gwillen>
ossifrage: it's not necessarily totally intuitive, but the console has its own wallet dropdown, separate from the one in the main window
< gwillen>
if you have thoughts on how it could be made more intuitive, I encourage you to share, but since the console is mostly meant for power users, I think there is not a lot of push behind making it more user-friendly
< gwillen>
probably it should display it more prominently in the commands and responses, like a prompt or something, I don't recall off the top of my head whether or where it is shown other than in the dropdown
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 4de3c15 fanquake: depends: add patch to common dependencies
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master dfc02da MarcoFalke: Merge #16051: depends: add patch to common dependencies
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16051: depends: add patch to common dependencies (master...depends-needs-patch) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16051
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #15812: Do not generate coverage report on test failures (master...fix-issue-15648-test-coverage-report) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15812
< luke-jr>
[16:36:12] [405] luke-jr #bitcoin-builds You have joined too many channels
< luke-jr>
we don't need a channel for every little thing :/
< wumpus>
I've joined, but agree, it's like this channel is super busy
< wumpus>
+not
< dongcarl>
Well I expect sometimes it'll be cfields imparting his neckbeard wisdom in freeform poetry and me trying desperately to cram it in my head, so perhaps an alt channel for those specifics where others can still see the convo would be good :-) I'm gunna give it a try anyway