< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheCharlatan opened pull request #12971: Ugrade Qt depends to Qt5.9.4 (master...Qt59) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12971
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8480d41e0f9d...4ba6da55743a
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 45dd135 Pieter Wuille: Fix csBestBlock/cvBlockChange waiting in rpc/mining
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 4a6c0e3 Pieter Wuille: Modernize best block mutex/cv/hash variable naming
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 4ba6da5 Pieter Wuille: Merge #12743: Fix csBestBlock/cvBlockChange waiting in rpc/mining...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #12743: Fix csBestBlock/cvBlockChange waiting in rpc/mining (master...201803_waitblockchange) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12743
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/4ba6da55743a...5df84de583c9
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 339730a Cory Fields: logging: bypass timestamp formatting when not logging...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5df84de Pieter Wuille: Merge #12970: logging: bypass timestamp formatting when not logging...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #12970: logging: bypass timestamp formatting when not logging (master...slow-tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12970
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ken2812221 opened pull request #12972: trivial: Use python3 explicitly (master...explicit_python3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12972
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #12973: Avoid std::locale/imbue madness in DateTimeStrFormat (master...201804_noimbue) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12973
< jonasschnelli> Odroid XU4 with SSD (via USB) took already 12h for height 416292 progress=0.426028
< jonasschnelli> CPU could be used more... rarely goes over 130%. Maybe this changes when blocks get bigger
< sipa> jonasschnelli: past the assumevalid point CPU usage will go up
< jonasschnelli> sipa: you mean skip verification for blocks in 2016 (or even until later) with assumevalid set to some block in early 2017?
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Empact opened pull request #12976: Remove return and corruptionPossible arguments from DoS, rename to Reject (master...drop-dos-return-scripted) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12976
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Empact closed pull request #12463: Drop the return and corruptionPossible arguments from CValidationState::DoS, and rename to ::Reject (master...drop-dos-return) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12463
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/5df84de583c9...94deb093499c
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8cbc5c4 Ben Woosley: Drop dead code CScript::Find...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 94deb09 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #12969: Drop dead code CScript::Find...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] promag opened pull request #12977: Refactor g_wallet_init_interface to const reference (master...2018-04-walletinitinterface) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12977
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #12969: Drop dead code CScript::Find (master...cscript-find) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12969
< aj> wumpus: #12885 needs rebasing now :(
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12885 | Reduce implementation code inside CScript by sipa · Pull Request #12885 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< wumpus> aj: easy rebase I think
< aj> wumpus: sure, but still
< wumpus> if anyone had told me that #12885 was ready for merge I would have merged that one first
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12885 | Reduce implementation code inside CScript by sipa · Pull Request #12885 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< hkjn0> re gitian+docker, it actually is possible to use docker on non-x86_64; I use it heavily on my armv7l machines for example
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #12960: doc: Revert to previous header include policy (master...Mf1804-docIncludes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12960
< wumpus> hkjn0: good to know
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/94deb093499c...e625548e7cae
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa72f34 MarcoFalke: bitcoin-tx: Remove unused for loop
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e625548 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #12950: bitcoin-tx: Flatten for loop over one element...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #12950: bitcoin-tx: Flatten for loop over one element (master...Mf1804-bitcoinTxUnusedLoop) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12950
< swampthing> how to get free bitcoin?
< swampthing> why?
< yair24> hi
< Randolf> Hello yair24.
< yair24> I am new
< Randolf> New to Bitcoin? Or new to Bitcoin development?
< yair24> new to both
< Randolf> Well, in that case I suggest that you keep an eye on the #bitcoin channel as well. This #bitcoin-core-dev is likely to get quite advanced, but you're certainly welcome to be here too.
< yair24> ok thanks. there is for beginer developpers?
<@wumpus> yes, #bitcoin
< Randolf> yair24: There is the #bitcoin-dev channel. I also suggest that you get familiar with the GitHub.com repository for Bitcoin.
<@wumpus> #bitcoin-dev is virtually dead, best is to just use #bitcoin
< Randolf> Thanks wumpus.
< Randolf> yair24: Forget what I suggested about the #bitcoin-dev channel.
< yair24> this github actaly has the code of blockchain?
< Randolf> Yes.
< yair24> ok I forget
< Randolf> Of the software that runs it.
<@wumpus> move this to #bitcoin please
< yair24> in what language is it written?
<@wumpus> last warning
< yair24> ah ok sorry
< jnewbery> p2p_compactblocks.py failures in travis is getting very annoying!
< kallewoof> Glad it's not just me.
< sdaftuar> jnewbery: agree. i think there may be a bug. just opened an issue to track
< sdaftuar> would be curious to know if anyone is able to reproduce locally (i'm trying)
< instagibbs> I actually think I did
< instagibbs> Let's see if I can do it consistently
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e625548e7cae...23e7fe8be827
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master cba2800 practicalswift: Increase signal-to-noise ratio in debug.log by adjusting log level when logging failed non-manual connect():s...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 23e7fe8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #12569: net: Increase signal-to-noise ratio in debug.log by adjusting log level when logging failed non-manual connect():s...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #12569: net: Increase signal-to-noise ratio in debug.log by adjusting log level when logging failed non-manual connect():s (master...logging-signal-to-noise) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12569
< jnewbery> sdaftuar: I believe I've worked out the cause for the p2p_compactblocks failure. Take a look at #12978 and let me know what you think
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12978 | p2p_compactblocks.py failing occasionally on master · Issue #12978 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/23e7fe8be827...5f2a39946fd4
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 69b01e6 Andrew Chow: Add cancel button to rescan progress dialog...
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master ae1d2b0 Andrew Chow: Give an error when rescan is aborted by the user
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5f2a399 Jonas Schnelli: Merge #11200: Allow for aborting rescans in the GUI...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #11200: Allow for aborting rescans in the GUI (master...gui-recan-abort) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11200
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #12979: Split validationinterface into paralell validation/mempool interfaces (master...2018-04-mempoolinterface) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12979
< BlueMatt> wumpus: can you add #12979 to high-prio? its the split up of the feeestimator refactoring pr
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12979 | Split validationinterface into paralell validation/mempool interfaces by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #12979 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<@wumpus> BlueMatt: sure. can you take a look at #12791 btw? it's pretty much ready for merge except that it needs a trivial rebase (for the release notes) and for one comment by jnewbery about the documentation.
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12791 | Expose a transactions weight via RPC by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #12791 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<@wumpus> BlueMatt: so I guess #12979 should be in place of #11775? (as one is the first part of the other, as I understand)
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12979 | Split validationinterface into paralell validation/mempool interfaces by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #12979 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11775 | Move fee estimator into validationinterface/cscheduler thread by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #11775 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< BlueMatt> wumpus: correct
< BlueMatt> yes, will take a look at 12791 now
< BlueMatt> wumpus: ok, fixed 12791
<@wumpus> BlueMatt: thanks
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #12980: Allow quicker shutdowns during LoadBlockIndex() (master...2018/04/shutdown) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12980
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #12981: [DO NOT MERGE] [logging] Add logging to UpdatedBlockTip (master...p2p_compactblocks_race) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12981
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #12982: Fix inconsistent namespace formatting guidelines (master...pr/namespace) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12982
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #12983: Modify change identification to use hdsplit keypath (master...ischangesplit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12983