< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f373beebbcc0...05623c021681
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d003110 Hennadii Stepanov: Remove unused guard
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 05623c0 fanquake: Merge #16350: qt: Remove unused guard
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #16350: qt: Remove unused guard (master...20190707-remove-unused-guard) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16350
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/05623c021681...2b465195e09a
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 64b27c4 fanquake: docs: add reduce-memory.md
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 2b46519 fanquake: Merge #16339: doc: add reduce-memory.md
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #16339: doc: add reduce-memory.md (master...doc-reduce-memory-usage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16339
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2b465195e09a...e1a8d76aff8d
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 84ad4d2 Carl Dong: doc: Include static members in Doxygen
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e1a8d76 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16347: doc: Include static members in Doxygen
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16347: doc: Include static members in Doxygen (master...2019-07-doxygen-extract-static) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16347
< promag> imo #16106 is ready to merge
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16106 | gui: Sort wallets in open wallet menu by promag · Pull Request #16106 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< promag> #15305 seems like forgotten
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15305 | [validation] Crash if disconnecting a block fails by sdaftuar · Pull Request #15305 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< fanquake> promag I’ll look at sort wallets tonight, sorry.
< promag> no worries
< promag> #16285 is also a pretty simple change
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16285 | rpc: Improve scantxoutset response and help message by promag · Pull Request #16285 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< hebasto> promag: fanquake: hi, did you try to build with downloaded Qt 5.7.1?
< promag> hebasto: no
< promag> hebasto: the problem only exists with 5.7.1?
< fanquake> on Debian with -nowallet? I used apt installed.
< hebasto> it seems so...
< fanquake> Assuming I’m thinking of the right issue.
< promag> let's just bump to qt 5.10 X)
< hebasto> yes, i build on Debian, but it is not convenient to investigate a bug with system Qt
< hebasto> promag: we should wait for stretch EOL at least ;)
< promag> hebasto: if the problem doesn't exists with depends then I wouldn't be too worried
< hebasto> anyway, consider to remove a private slot in #16349, if you don't mind
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16349 | qt: Fix "opening a wallet" issue #15453 by hebasto · Pull Request #16349 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< promag> hebasto: wrong pr?
< hebasto> promag: correct ;) I mean WalletController::addWallet private slot.
< promag> whats the problem with that?
< hebasto> It seems redundant: everything could be run in one thread, IMO
< promag> hebasto: but it's not
< promag> m_node.handleLoadWallet
< promag> that callback is called from different thread
< promag> for instance, from the loadwallet rpc thread
< hebasto> I'll look into it more thoroughly.
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e1a8d76aff8d...f5a01cf25986
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a30bd09 Gregory Sanders: Add logpath description for getrpcinfo
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master f5a01cf Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16332: rpc: Add logpath description for getrpcinfo
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16332: rpc: Add logpath description for getrpcinfo (master...getrpcinfo_logpath_help) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16332
< wumpus> getLoadedWallets() lol
< fanquake> wumpus: too explicit?
< wumpus> promag_: I'm not a native speaker but that sounds somehow wrong
< wumpus> at least it's funny
< wumpus> I'm not sure all the additional changes are necessary in a PR that just adds deterministic sorting, but YMMV
< wumpus> ok using a map in listWalletDir seems an improvement because there's a second pass that is now O(N^2)
< wumpus> well not N^2 but ... removing things one by one from a vector is still a code stink usually
< wumpus> so +1 on that, did leave a comment about some other (likely unexpected) change of behavior
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f5a01cf25986...983c84844c59
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e8fabd9 fanquake: build: prune dbus from depends
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 983c848 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16352: build: prune dbus from depends
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16352: build: prune dbus from depends (master...depends_prune_dbus) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16352
< cdecker> Bind alt-n to toggle the nicklist.
< cdecker> Oops, wrong window ^^"
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/983c84844c59...b5fa2319d863
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1eb13f0 Jon Atack: test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 3bf2b3a Jon Atack: test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7195fa7 Jon Atack: test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #15687: test: tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (master...tool-wallet-tests-for-unexpected-writes-to-wallet-file) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15687
< promag> wumpus: what the problem with getLoadedWallets?
< wumpus> promag: it sounds strange to me (and not just because of the double definition of 'loaded' esp in the context of money)
< promag> I could drop 2nd commit or rename to something else
< wumpus> yea, I'm not sure the renaming is necessary at all
< promag> but more importantly is that currently listWalletDir is called twice
< promag> I'm going to address your comment, let me know if the rename can be dropped (could keep a comment thought)
< wumpus> getOpenWallets maybe ?
< promag> sold
< wumpus> let's do that then :)
< promag> done
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #16351: 0.18 backport: backport github-merge.py improvements (0.18...backport_github_merge_improvements) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16351
< wumpus> promag: I think something went wrong in 16106
< promag> wumpus: yeah, outdated branch
< promag> wumpus: should be ok now
< wumpus> rechecking
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b5fa2319d863...2679bb8919b5
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 224eb95 João Barbosa: gui: Sort wallets in open wallet menu
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa90fe6 João Barbosa: refactor: Rename getWallets to getOpenWallets in WalletController
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 2679bb8 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16106: gui: Sort wallets in open wallet menu
< promag> thanks
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16106: gui: Sort wallets in open wallet menu (master...2019-05-followup-15957) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16106
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jamesob opened pull request #16355: refactor: move CCoinsViewErrorCatcher out of init.cpp (master...2019-07-au-coinscatcher) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16355
< jnewbery> MarcoFalke: is #15891 ready for merge or are there comments outstanding? It has 3 ACKs
< gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15891 | test: Require standard txs in regtest by default by MarcoFalke · Pull Request #15891 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jnewbery> achow101: what makes you think fqlx is from the review club? I don't think he's ever commented in there
< jnewbery> also, why would we block someone who's clearly just trying to help?! Can't you just ask him to look at the contributing docs and review smaller PRs first?
< sipa> agree
< achow101> jnewbery: he was asked multiple times and didn't seem to actually do it
< promag> hebasto: omg
< promag> someone: how can I search git history for a string?
< jarthur> If searching commit messages, specifically: `git log --grep=<pattern>` To search the actual code changes: `git grep <regexp> $(git rev-list --all)`
< promag> jarthur: thanks, I've used git log -S
< wumpus> I agree blocking them goes a bit far if they're just trying to help, though if they keep commenting while clearly not understanding the code it is kind of annoying
< jb55> promag: I've always used git log -G for searching for strings, it seems to work well.
< jb55> there is some subtle difference between the two which I have yet to understand
< hebasto> promag: the question remains: why only Qt 5.7.1 needs that bugfix?
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 5 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2679bb8919b5...4882040182ea
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa5e9f1 MarcoFalke: build: Stop translating PACKAGE_NAME
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fabe87d MarcoFalke: scripted-diff: Avoid passing PACKAGE_NAME for translation
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fab8520 MarcoFalke: qt: Run «make translate» in ./src/
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16291: gui: Stop translating PACKAGE_NAME (master...1906-noTranslatePackageName) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16291
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/4882040182ea...0a6ee9797e65
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 91509ff Kirill Fomichev: bench: Benchmark blockToJSON
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0a6ee97 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16267: bench: Benchmark blockToJSON
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16267: bench: Benchmark blockToJSON (master...bench-blocktojson) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16267
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0a6ee9797e65...345f42a9e3ae
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c4606b8 practicalswift: Add Travis check for single parameter constructors not marked "explicit"
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 345f42a Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #14505: test: Add linter to make sure single parameter constructors ...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #14505: test: Add linter to make sure single parameter constructors are marked explicit (master...explicit-single-argument-constructors) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14505
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/345f42a9e3ae...c799976c86e2
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e1a5569 Gregory Sanders: Delete error-prone CScript constructor
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c799976 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16128: Delete error-prone CScript constructor only used with FindAn...
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16128: Delete error-prone CScript constructor only used with FindAndDelete (master...cscript_construct) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16128
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs closed pull request #13057: refactor pre-selected coin code (master...selectedcoins) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13057
< achow101> does bdb handle large binary blobs well? or should I break it up into separate records?
< sipa> achow101: are you going to rewrite all of them everytime something is updated?
< achow101> maybe? it'd be the descriptor cache
< sipa> probably better to split that up in per-index entries
< sipa> as they're only written once
< sipa> if they are a single blob, you'd be rewriting the whole thing every time
< achow101> right
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] cajunlady78 opened pull request #16356: BIP148 user activated activation of segwit (master...bip-segwit-flagday) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16356
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] cajunlady78 closed pull request #16356: BIP148 user activated activation of segwit (master...bip-segwit-flagday) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16356
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] nkostoulas opened pull request #16357: Implement modulo for arith_uint256 (master...uint256-modulo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16357