< gleb>
Oh forgot about the meeting. I was wondering if we can add #16702 to high-prio. If we want to make it to the next release better start early, the change is not big but require reviewers looking into addrman so..
< gribble>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16702 | p2p: supplying and using asmap to improve IP bucketing in addrman by naumenkogs . Pull Request #16702 . bitcoin/bitcoin . GitHub
< gleb>
As a general question, is it better to ask for things like this during the meeting? Since there is a special high prio slot in the meeting.
< fanquake>
gleb: yea sounds like you should bring it up next meeting. Propose a topic with the # so it isn't forgotten.
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master 4a96e45 Sjors Provoost: [gui] send: show watch-only balance in send screen
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master abb30de Samuel Dobson: Merge #17587: gui: show watch-only balance in send screen
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] meshcollider merged pull request #17587: gui: show watch-only balance in send screen (master...2019/11/send_balance) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17587
< fanquake>
wumpus I saw that earlier and double-checked, I couldn't find any version numbers that were cropped in the macOS release binaries
< Sentineo>
FYI the verify-commits script was failing for me again. And doing a pull of keys as stated in the readme did not resolve it sadly. Anybody having the same issue? Had trouble getting this key: 262685BC78ED11FB
< Sentineo>
was on 23cecd6cd56f952c757f469c46d7593c2ffaa419 when running it
< wumpus>
there is no maintainer key 262685BC78ED11FB, where did you see it used?
< wumpus>
merge commit 23cecd6cd56f952c757f469c46d7593c2ffaa419 is signed by my key
< Sentineo>
wumpus: I wend to github and checked the key of the commit signed, that is where it said so
< Sentineo>
*went
< Sentineo>
I should be able to reproduce that by going back with git reflog to the state the repo was before. I lost patience and just did a git pull
< wumpus>
and "git pull" did a fast forward, I suppose? in that case, there's probably nothing fishy going on there
< Sentineo>
wumpus: yes it did
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #17633: tests: Add option --valgrind to run the functional tests under Valgrind (master...functional-valgrind) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17633