< vasild>
ryanofsky: ysangkok: yes, RenameOver() uses std::rename(). I presume "all" platforms overwrite the destination, but maybe not in an atomic manner. Better to switch to the C++17 variant (once we enable C++17).
< elichai2>
MarcoFalke: I like your new github avatar ;)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #18300: fuzz: Add option to merge input dir to test runner (master...Mf1902-fuzzMerge) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18300
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke reopened pull request #18300: fuzz: Add option to merge input dir to test runner (master...Mf1902-fuzzMerge) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18300
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master fab7d14 MarcoFalke: test: Check that wait_until returns if time point is in the past
< bitcoin-git>
bitcoin/master d20d5dc Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #18285: test: Check that wait_until returns if time point is in the ...
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #18285: test: Check that wait_until returns if time point is in the past (master...2002-debugBoost) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18285
< wumpus>
hebasto: I'd really like to see progress on that but I don't know enough about build system internals to comment on it
< hebasto>
wumpus: it seems its author (ch4ot1c) is not active on gh since december
< hebasto>
wumpus: label it "Up for grabs" ?
< wumpus>
ok
< Chris_Stewart_5>
sdaftuar_: In regards to your wtxid proposal, what is the reason for adding new messages rather than just repurposing the protocol version field or service identifier as bitvectors?
< sipa>
Chris_Stewart_5: limited namespace
< sipa>
version numbers are sequential, making arbitrary subsets of features hard, and changing them to be bitvectors would make them grow much faster
< sipa>
service flags are only used for discoverable properties (as those are rumoured on the P2P network in addr messages)
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #13693: [test] Add coverage to estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee (master...test-estimatefee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13693
< bitcoin-git>
[bitcoin] MarcoFalke reopened pull request #13693: [test] Add coverage to estimaterawfee and estimatesmartfee (master...test-estimatefee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13693