06:39 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #18349: build: Fix quick hack for version string in releases (master...20200314-version-workaround) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18349

13:56 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheQuantumPhysicist opened pull request #18350: Fix mining to an invalid target + ensure that a new block has the correct hash internally (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18350

13:57 < vasild> jonatack: Indeed BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(logargs) intercepts and inspects the logs, thanks for the hint! I created a unit test for #17994, but its not viable to add it because it would require filling up a few 128MiB files with data. In my tests I lowered MAX_BLOCKFILE_SIZE so that only a few blocks suffice to overflow a blk file.

13:57 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17994 | validation: flush undo files after last block write by kallewoof · Pull Request #17994 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

14:36 < jonatack> vasild: nice work!

14:39 < jonatack> vasild: looking at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17994#issuecomment-599031098 too +1

16:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] dannmat opened pull request #18351: Updated text on send confirmation dialog (master...Mar-20-send-confirmation-dialog) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18351

16:35 < jnewbery> Any chance to get #16902 in before feature freeze? 5 ACKs

16:35 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16902 | O(1) OP_IF/NOTIF/ELSE/ENDIF script implementation by sipa · Pull Request #16902 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

16:43 < ysangkok> meshcollider: where is that blog post about hyperellictic curves you mentioned in the meeting of march 13?

17:13 < sipa> ysangkok: https://twitter.com/aszepieniec/status/1237823102677114883?s=19

17:13 < ysangkok> thanks!

17:41 < wumpus> jnewbery: I don't know if it really classifies as feature, but doesn't matter, if it had enough review it should be merged

17:44 < sipa> yeah, i think there is no urgency for that to be in a release, but if people believe it's ready, it's ready

19:10 < jeremyrubin> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UorrYGPbVh-KJliw4KDyeeWDGDSKRCsYgM3ieV6mh74/edit#gid=0

19:11 < jeremyrubin> Not super core-dev related but just good to look at & think about w.r.t. event planning and stuff

19:11 < jeremyrubin> It looks like a large amount of the eth development community is sick

20:04 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 4 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7f8176a1ebd0...67dfd18f4401

20:04 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 89fb241 Pieter Wuille: Benchmark script verification with 100 nested IFs

20:04 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d0e8f4d Anthony Towns: [refactor] interpreter: define interface for vfExec

20:04 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e6e622e Pieter Wuille: Implement O(1) OP_IF/NOTIF/ELSE/ENDIF logic

20:05 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16902: O(1) OP_IF/NOTIF/ELSE/ENDIF script implementation (master...201909_o1nestedifs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16902

20:06 < vasild> jonatack: thanks!

21:09 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #18352: WIP NOMERGE [bench] gitian builds for OP_IF bench (master...2003-benchGitianOPIF) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18352

22:37 < jnewbery> wumpus: yeah, not a feature, but not a bugfix, so presumably not mergeable after feature freeze? Thanks for merging :)