04:45 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #18713: scripts: Add MACHO stack canary check to security-check.py (master...check_MACHO_canary) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18713

06:10 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] RandyMcMillan opened pull request #18714: doc: edit for clarity (master...doc-depends-readme) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18714

08:00 < jonasschnelli> bitcoinbuilds.org fails on master since da4cbb7927497ca3261c1504c3b85dd3f5800673 (20h ago)

08:01 < jonasschnelli> (merge of #18544)

08:01 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18544 | net: limit BIP37 filter lifespan (active between filterload..filterclear) by theStack · Pull Request #18544 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

08:01 < jonasschnelli> p2p_filter.py fails

08:01 < jonasschnelli> https://bitcoinbuilds.org/index.php?ansilog=b3d4f4bf-5d4b-4957-9bf3-91ffe4a799fb.log#l2935

09:50 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] CyberDevAi opened pull request #18716: Hard forking Bitcoin Core for New Bitcoin UNV Crypto asset (master...0.20) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18716

09:50 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #18716: Hard forking Bitcoin Core for New Bitcoin UNV Crypto asset (master...0.20) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18716

10:08 < fanquake> sipa: can you block CyberDevAi

10:27 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] CyberDevAi opened pull request #18720: 0.20 (master...0.20) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18720

10:29 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #18720: 0.20 (master...0.20) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18720

11:28 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c4c3f110eb93...4ad6144ed028

11:28 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c743718 Sebastian Falbesoner: test: add further BIP37 size limit checks to p2p_filter.py

11:28 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 4ad6144 MarcoFalke: Merge #18672: test: add further BIP37 size limit checks to p2p_filter.py

11:29 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18672: test: add further BIP37 size limit checks to p2p_filter.py (master...20200416-test-add-further-bloom-filter-size-limit-checks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18672

12:00 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #18721: test: Fix linter issue (master...200421-linter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18721

12:02 < meshcollider> Has there been an increase in spammers recently? Or is this normal frequency and I just haven't noticed...

12:08 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/4ad6144ed028...977328338e46

12:08 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 60cdcf3 Hennadii Stepanov: test: Fix linter issue

12:08 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 9773283 MarcoFalke: Merge #18721: test: Fix linter issue

12:08 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18721: test: Fix linter issue (master...200421-linter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18721

12:09 < fanquake> Meshcollider: probably a bit of an uptick. Along with the phishing emails

13:11 < hebasto> MarcoFalke: which system are you testing 18699 on?

13:17 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] vasild opened pull request #18722: addrman: use unordered_map instead of map (master...addrman_map) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18722

14:01 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #18723: Expand on contracting carve-out rule test (master...onemore_again) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18723

15:00 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/977328338e46...9ea4d8326a9d

15:00 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fac2fc4 MarcoFalke: test: Increase debugging to hunt down mempool_reorg intermittent failure

15:00 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 9ea4d83 MarcoFalke: Merge #18704: test: Increase debugging to hunt down mempool_reorg intermit...

15:01 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18704: test: Increase debugging to hunt down mempool_reorg intermittent failure (master...2004-testMempoolReorgIntermittentFailureHuntDownIncreaseDebugLogStatements) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18704

16:33 < hebasto> due to the recent GH glitch on #18699 my single comment becomes multiple clones; please remove redundant

16:33 < gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18699 | wallet: Avoid translating RPC errors by MarcoFalke · Pull Request #18699 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub

16:47 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #18724: test: add coverage for -rpcwallet cli option (master...rpcwallet-tests) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18724

17:07 < stevenroose> Any idea what the `getnewaddress` argument will become for taproot addresses? Because I assume they are also "bech32" encoded?

17:45 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9ea4d8326a9d...b6a5dc90bfd4

17:45 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 3c21db7 Gloria Zhao: [test] add 8 error messages to feature_segwit and change version to type

17:45 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b6a5dc9 MarcoFalke: Merge #18384: [test] more specific feature_segwit test error messages and ...

17:45 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #18384: [test] more specific feature_segwit test error messages and fixing incorrect comments (master...segwit-test-errormsg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18384

17:47 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #18725: Expand CPFP "carve-out" rule from N=1 to N=100 (master...many_more_relay) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18725

18:38 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] robot-visions opened pull request #18726: test: check misbehavior more independently in p2p_filter.py (master...p2p-filter) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18726

18:59 < luke-jr> stevenroose: why should there be a new one?

19:00 < luke-jr> stevenroose: either your wallet supports them and they're always used for bech32, or it doesn't and they never are?

19:03 < sipa> agree; the sender shouldn't care what kind of locking mechanism the receiver uses

19:03 < sipa> only what kind of address

19:13 < stevenroose> luke-jr, sipa: wait does that mean that a user can't chose to get a p2wpkh or p2trpk explicitly?

19:14 < sipa> stevenroose: they'd do so by having a p2wpkh or p2tr wallet

19:15 < stevenroose> sipa: hmm, that might have changed since 0.18, but currently to get a p2wpkh from the wallet you do `getnewaddress "" bech32`

19:16 < sipa> stevenroose: descriptor wallets are more stateful

19:17 < sipa> you have a descriptor in the wallet for every "type" of address you'd want to request

19:17 < sipa> if the bech32 one is a p2wpkh descriptor, you'd get a p2wpkh address

19:17 < sipa> if it's a p2tr descriptor, you'd get a p2tr address

19:17 < stevenroose> oh

19:18 < sipa> it's no longer the case that all of them share the same keys, necessarily, and you can turn any key in any kind of address

19:54 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #18727: test: Add CreateWalletFromFile test (master...pr/create) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18727

22:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #18728: GUI: Enable changing the autoprune block space size in intro dialog (master...intro_prune_size) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18728

22:09 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #18729: GUI/Intro: Never change the prune checkbox after the user has touched it (master...intro_dont_change_user_prune) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18729

23:01 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #18730: wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (master...2004-walletNoUpgrade) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18730