< sipa> fanquake: what aarch64 hardware do you have?
< fanquake> sipa: Apple M1 mac-mini
< sipa> oh, and you run a linux env in a VM on that?
< fanquake> Yea
< fanquake> I'll probably track down some other hardware too. However this box was sponsored, and is handy to test the M1 cross-compile and aarch64 things.
< sipa> i'm pretty happy with my Odroid N2+, fwiw
< dongcarl> I've heard good things about the HoneyComb LX2 and the Socionext Developerbox... Supposedly Socionext runs very well with vanilla aarch64 debian
< sipa> being able to run vanilla debian is nice
< roconnor> dongcarl: that feels ... a bit overkill.
< roconnor> hopefully the build of Bitcoin is independent of which version of guix you are using? Or maybe the specific bootstrap data is tied to guix versions, and that is what you are worried about?
< dongcarl> roconnor: So Guix's package definitions are in the same tree as itself, so basically you want to pin the version of Guix in order to pin the packages. There is also the "inferiors" feature (https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Inferiors.html), however, that API is subject to change... Just like Guix's command line invocation is subject to
< dongcarl> change... So I went with the most fail-proof thing: just use `time-machine`
< fanquake> sipa: I might just buy one of those
< fanquake> Also can you block saadbitcoin
< sipa> in a few hours; not at conputer right now
< roconnor> dongcarl: oh so there is no nix / nixpkgs distinction in guix? ... if you are familiar with nix.
< dongcarl> roconnor: Right, it's all one monorepo
< sipa> dongcarl: is that just a temporary measure, so they can easily make tree-wide refactorings while not all of the structure/internal API is stable?
< sipa> or will that stay?
< dongcarl> sipa: I honestly don't know much about the particular rationale behind this structuring... I'm guessing it was just convenient and they never found a desperate need to change it (especially not if the inferior interface matures)
< provoostenator> I could still use some hints on #22341 (cc achow101, instagibbs)
<@gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22341 | rpc: add getxpub by Sjors · Pull Request #22341 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
< jonatack> lightlike: that's true
< roconnor> dongcarl: according to the Guix readme, the derivation files are compatible with can can be built by nix. Maybe you could make an archive of the colosure of the derivation files available to me?
< roconnor> actually nevermind, they hare going to have a guix root directory and so they cannot so simply be imported.
< instagibbs> provoostenator, ive been out of a loop a long time, achow101 would be the one to harass
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #22479: p2p, doc: log DEBUG_ADDRMAN consistency checks, add developer notes info (master...debug-addrman) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22479
< provoostenator> instagibbs: return to the loop!
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] keystrike opened pull request #22480: doc: Moved -debuglogfile option to Debugging options (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22480
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] keystrike closed pull request #22480: doc: Moved -debuglogfile option to Debugging options (master...master) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22480