<
luke-jr>
prayank[m]: no, I saw the one I linked you in PM the other day
<
roconnor>
are non-0xc0 tapleaf spends (incorrectly) considered standard by policy?
<
roconnor>
oh, the policy is split up between IsWitnessStandard and VerifyWitnessProgram.
<
_aj_>
roconnor: it's tested in the "Future leaf versions" section of feature_taproot.py, but doesn't seem to be hit in the unit tests