< echeveria> woof, yeah. 0.18 loves spinning openconn.
< wumpus> hope rc4 sigs will be up today, I likely won't be able to sign/upload distributions rest of the week
< fanquake_> wumpus Looks like everything is ready, just waiting for cfields to push them up
< wumpus> fanquake_: thanks
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 3 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/56376f336548...08bd21a3bda9
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8c7b932 Pieter Wuille: Pure python EC
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b679785 John Newbery: Add comments to Python ECDSA implementation
< bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 08bd21a MarcoFalke: Merge #15826: Pure python EC
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #15826: Pure python EC (master...201904_pythonec) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15826
< cfields> jonasschnelli: possible for you to tag and push in detached sigs?
< cfields> I pushed my sig over the weekend, but I reinstalled on a new HDD, and gpg is giving me trouble with tagging.
< cfields> jonasschnelli: git tag -s v0.18.0rc4 223fe938a848bec29c6 -m "v0.18.0rc4" && git push origin v0.18.0rc4
< cfields> I'll keep working on it in the meantime.
< cfields> ...of course it works now.
< cfields> gitian builders: detached sigs for v0.18.0rc4 are up
< cfields> sorry for the delay. jonasschnelli: nevermind :)
< fanquake_> cheers cfields
< fanquake_> pushed some signed sigs up
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #15866: test: Add missing syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue to wallet_import_rescan (master...1904-testSync) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15866
< jonasschnelli> cfields: great you could do it. back on my desk in 6h earliest.
< wumpus> cfields: woohoo, thanks!
< cfields> fanquake_/wumpus: thanks for being so quick :)
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #15868: rpc: Add have_pruned to getblockchaininfo (master...1904-rpcPruned) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15868
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #15869: Add settings merge test to prevent regresssions (master...pr/testset) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15869
< bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #15870: wallet: Only fail rescan when blocks have actually been pruned (master...1904-walletRescanPruned) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15870
< riperk> On the bitcoin-dev ML, ZmnSCPxj linked to "coinjoin sudoku" as a reason you need to use equal-value outputs for privacy coinjoins
< riperk> Wouldn't you just need to make sure every input is ambiguously associated with every output?
< riperk> (i.e. every transaction input must belong to at least one subset of every output amount)
< riperk> If I'm right, that's a pretty easy thing to model if both parties trust an orchestrator (like the blockchain.info service used to have)
< emilr> equal-value outputs == (i.e. every transaction input must below to at least one subset of every output amount)
< gmaxwell> riperk: right, similar to how the changeless coin selection works in core.
< luke-jr> src/test/test_bitcoin: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.11' not found (required by src/test/test_bitcoin)
< luke-jr> any ideas? :/
< luke-jr> (this is inside a Travis VM)