06:53 < echeveria> woof, yeah. 0.18 loves spinning openconn.

08:36 < wumpus> hope rc4 sigs will be up today, I likely won't be able to sign/upload distributions rest of the week

09:16 < fanquake_> wumpus Looks like everything is ready, just waiting for cfields to push them up

10:40 < wumpus> fanquake_: thanks

12:11 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 3 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/56376f336548...08bd21a3bda9

12:11 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8c7b932 Pieter Wuille: Pure python EC

12:11 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b679785 John Newbery: Add comments to Python ECDSA implementation

12:11 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 08bd21a MarcoFalke: Merge #15826: Pure python EC

12:12 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #15826: Pure python EC (master...201904_pythonec) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15826

12:28 < cfields> jonasschnelli: possible for you to tag and push in detached sigs?

12:29 < cfields> I pushed my sig over the weekend, but I reinstalled on a new HDD, and gpg is giving me trouble with tagging.

12:32 < cfields> jonasschnelli: git tag -s v0.18.0rc4 223fe938a848bec29c6 -m "v0.18.0rc4" && git push origin v0.18.0rc4

12:32 < cfields> I'll keep working on it in the meantime.

12:39 < cfields> ...of course it works now.

12:40 < cfields> gitian builders: detached sigs for v0.18.0rc4 are up

12:40 < cfields> sorry for the delay. jonasschnelli: nevermind :)

12:43 < fanquake_> cheers cfields

12:56 < fanquake_> pushed some signed sigs up

13:02 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #15866: test: Add missing syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue to wallet_import_rescan (master...1904-testSync) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15866

13:06 < jonasschnelli> cfields: great you could do it. back on my desk in 6h earliest.

14:15 < wumpus> cfields: woohoo, thanks!

14:51 < wumpus> rc4 binaries up https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.18.0/test.rc4/

15:52 < cfields> fanquake_/wumpus: thanks for being so quick :)

17:31 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #15868: rpc: Add have_pruned to getblockchaininfo (master...1904-rpcPruned) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15868

17:32 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ryanofsky opened pull request #15869: Add settings merge test to prevent regresssions (master...pr/testset) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15869

17:55 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #15870: wallet: Only fail rescan when blocks have actually been pruned (master...1904-walletRescanPruned) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15870

19:13 < riperk> On the bitcoin-dev ML, ZmnSCPxj linked to "coinjoin sudoku" as a reason you need to use equal-value outputs for privacy coinjoins

19:14 < riperk> Wouldn't you just need to make sure every input is ambiguously associated with every output?

19:14 < riperk> (i.e. every transaction input must belong to at least one subset of every output amount)

19:16 < riperk> If I'm right, that's a pretty easy thing to model if both parties trust an orchestrator (like the blockchain.info service used to have)

20:33 < emilr> equal-value outputs == (i.e. every transaction input must below to at least one subset of every output amount)

20:36 < gmaxwell> riperk: right, similar to how the changeless coin selection works in core.

21:42 < luke-jr> src/test/test_bitcoin: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.11' not found (required by src/test/test_bitcoin)

21:42 < luke-jr> any ideas? :/

21:44 < luke-jr> (this is inside a Travis VM)