01:11 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] emilengler opened pull request #17747: SSL/TLS support for the HTTP(S) server (master...2019-12-ssl) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17747

08:26 < jonatack> instagibbs: i'm not quite sure what you are asking wrt labels. labels are set by the user in rpc getnewaddress or setlabel, and i use this functionality

08:29 < jonatack> instagibbs: the label purpose is assigned by bitcoin core based on the address, and is currently usable as an optional filter in rpc listlabels

08:43 < jonatack> the label purpose is either send or receive. in listtransactions, send or receive is returned as a category, and not part of the label field. this is how i would see the "purpose" being used.

08:47 < jonatack> in getaddressinfo, there is no category field returned, but ismine instead. perhaps i'm confused, but it looks to me like purpose, category, and ismine are being used interchangeably

08:48 < jonatack> anyone with context here, please enlighten me regarding the planned roadmap here

08:57 < jonatack> nvm the comment on the terms being interchanngeable. to me txn category and address ismine make sense, but label purpose less so.

09:15 < jonatack> there is some discussion in this "wallet and segwit" gist https://gist.github.com/sipa/125cfa1615946d0c3f3eec2ad7f250a2

10:28 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] emilengler closed pull request #17747: SSL/TLS support for the HTTP(S) server (master...2019-12-ssl) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17747

11:56 < wumpus> looks like https://github.com/bitcoin-core/univalue/pull/22 passes now

12:07 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ddecb671f0a4...a595011f5a3c

12:07 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7d26357 Andrew Chow: rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action

12:07 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a595011 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #17728: rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start act...

12:08 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #17728: rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action (master...fix-scantxoutset-args) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17728

12:22 < elichai2> Is there a cmd flag to tell bitcoind to ignore `bitcoin.conf`? or I need to remember to rename it back and forth whenever i'm benchmarking stuff?

12:49 < kinlo> just point it to an empty file?

13:07 < wumpus> maybe even -conf=/dev/null works :-)

13:08 < wumpus> an empty file will definitely work though

14:24 < elichai2> thx

16:30 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #17750: util: change GetWarnings parameter to bool (master...2019-12-getwarnings) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17750

22:17 < phantomcircuit> instagibbs, labels are exactly the same