03:27 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9313c4e6aa4b...21d6fed81550

03:27 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa27d6d MarcoFalke: fuzz: Remove unused --enable-danger-fuzz-link-all option

03:27 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 21d6fed fanquake: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21884: fuzz: Remove unused --enable-danger-fuzz-link...

03:27 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21884: fuzz: Remove unused --enable-danger-fuzz-link-all option (master...2105-fuzzNoDanger) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21884

04:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/21d6fed81550...8d5a0583c497

04:06 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa9249a MarcoFalke: depends: Add missing -D_LIBCPP_DEBUG=1 to debug flags

04:06 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8d5a058 fanquake: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21869: depends: Add missing -D_LIBCPP_DEBUG=1 to deb...

04:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #21869: depends: Add missing -D_LIBCPP_DEBUG=1 to debug flags (master...2105-dependsDebug) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21869

04:49 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #21135: scripts: check for control flow instrumentation in security-check.py (master...security_check_cf_protection) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21135

05:03 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 3 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8d5a0583c497...5925f1e65276

05:03 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 955eee7 W. J. van der Laan: net: Sanitize message type for logging

05:03 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 09205b3 W. J. van der Laan: net: Clarify message header validation errors

05:03 < bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5925f1e MarcoFalke: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21872: net: Sanitize message type for logging

05:04 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #21872: net: Sanitize message type for logging (master...2021-05-sanitize-messagetype) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21872

07:13 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #21889: macho: check for control flow instrumentation (master...build_boost_fcf_protectcion) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21889

08:06 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21890: fuzz: Limit ParseISO8601DateTime fuzzing to 32-bit (master...2105-fuzzTime32) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21890

08:28 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21891: fuzz: Remove strprintf test cases that are known to fail (master...2105-fuzzStr) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21891

08:55 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #21892: fuzz: Avoid excessively large min fee rate in tx_pool (master...2105-fuzzPool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21892

09:25 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Bushstar opened pull request #21894: gitignore: Add JetBrains CLion (master...gitignore-clion) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21894

10:50 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto opened pull request #21895: refactor: Add TSA annotations to the WorkQueue class members (master...210509-tsa) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21895

13:01 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] kallewoof opened pull request #21897: rpc: adjust incorrect RPCHelpMan types (master...202104-rpctypes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21897

16:29 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] wawesomeNOGUI opened pull request #21898: Add Whitepaper Link (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21898

16:36 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] mrkingfoxx opened pull request #21899: 0.21 (master...0.21) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21899

22:03 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #21899: 0.21 (master...0.21) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21899

22:04 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #21898: Add Whitepaper Link (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21898

23:20 < yanmaani> does bitcoin have a notion of "intrinsically valid transaction"?

23:20 < yanmaani> a transaction with locktime in the future is valid, just not right now

23:20 < yanmaani> a transaction that spends with an invalid script is never going to be valid

23:21 < yanmaani> is there a way to distinguish between the two?

23:24 < bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] theStack opened pull request #21900: test: use MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (master...20210507-test-convert_csvtest_miniwallet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21900

23:48 < sipa> yanmaani: they're called validity and finality

23:48 < sipa> a transaction is valid or invalid, unconditionally, but finality is dependent on time/height in the chain

23:57 < yanmaani> thanks!