<achow101>
There is 1 preproposed meeting topic this week, any last minute ones to add?
<TheCharlatan>
hi
<lightlike>
hi
<rkrux>
hi
preimage has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<achow101>
#topic Erlay WG Update (sr_gi, gleb, marcofleon)
<vasild>
#here
<sr_gi[m]>
I've been running the last set of planned simulations this week. I'm currently moving to implementing the changes on the open PR so we can test this with real nodes
<sr_gi[m]>
Will be trying this on Warnet as soon as we have a working version, and then proceed with the PR
<sr_gi[m]>
The results on simulation look promising :)
<sr_gi[m]>
That's it on my end
<achow101>
#topic Kernel WG Update (TheCharlatan)
<b10c>
hi
<TheCharlatan>
We discussed some ways forward towards getting the kernel API merged during the recent dev meeting.
<TheCharlatan>
The consensus was that the current API is not likely to get shipped in the upcoming release
<TheCharlatan>
Especially its reliance on assumeutxo mechanics and inflexibility towards other validation models are painpoints
<TheCharlatan>
At the same time, building out applications a bit more to inform design decisions, as well as getting better feedback on how the API changes as validation code evolves would be easier to do if the API were merged sooner than later.
Guest65 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<achow101>
"not likely to get shipped in the upcoming release" <-- 29.0 or 30.0?
<TheCharlatan>
So the focus in the near term will likely be trying to get it merged over the next months, albeit not slated as a library shipped in the releases quite yet.
Guest65 has quit [Client Quit]
<TheCharlatan>
achow101: 30
<Sjors[m]>
hi
<furszy>
hi
<TheCharlatan>
I will also try to work on a separate "big branch" with many of the desired changes to get the API into shape similarly to what Carl did to initially get a library together.
<TheCharlatan>
that's all from me :)
<achow101>
#topic MuSig2 WG Update (achow101)
<achow101>
I've addressed recent reviews on #31622
<corebot>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31622 | psbt: add non-default sighash types to PSBTs and unify sighash type match checking by achow101 · Pull Request #31622 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
<achow101>
I had to add a check that signatures are valid DER since one of the recent pushes caused a fuzz test failure
<achow101>
This is possibly a breaking change, although I don't expect it to actually impact anyone
<achow101>
The other current PRs to review are #31247 and #31243.
<achow101>
As was mentioned at CoreDev, these PRs are primarily deletions and it would be great to get these in to help reduce scope :)
<jon_atack>
hi
<jarolrod>
oh we're reducinngggg
<achow101>
#topic QML GUI WG Update (jarolrod, johnny9dev)
<glozow>
achow: \o/
<jarolrod>
No substantial update this week, several of us were traveling last week or currently are
<jarolrod>
Progress on the activity and send work should be wrapping up soon, and a lot of what you guys saw at the core dev should be in the repo by the next meeting.
<jarolrod>
And more to show at the next meeting!
<jarolrod>
fin
<achow101>
#topic orphan resolution WG Update (glozow)
<vasild>
next IRC or coredev meeting?
<jarolrod>
next irc meeting
<vasild>
:)
<instagibbs>
slight difference
<jarolrod>
BIG
<glozow>
hi! i wrote an update on the PR, but won’t get to it in the next couple weeks
<sipa>
on the research side, i've been having good discussions with aj and others about a min-cut linearization algorithm, i hope to have a prototype to experiment with soon
<sipa>
that's it for me
<achow101>
Any other topics to discuss this week?
jadi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
<abubakarsadiq>
@jon_atack I think it may be due to a lack of interest in hosting that it is only once a month. If I recall correctly, there have been multiple review clubs in the past after we switched to a monthly schedule when there was interest
<achow101>
#endmeeting
<corebot>
achow101: Meeting ended at 2025-03-06T16:38+0000